Re: (ASCEND) Pool summary not working, any ideas?

To: ascend@digistar.com
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Pool summary not working, any ideas?
From: Phillip Vandry <vandry@Mlink.NET>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 1998 11:09:13 -0500 (EST)
cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 19 Jan 1998 08:55:59 EST." <Pine.LNX.3.96.980119085159.9882A-100000@digistar.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

> What i'm saying is the first subnet is not a valid subnet.  
> 
> 194.64.165.0/24 and 194.64.165.1/24 are valid, where 194.64.165.1/27 isn't
> because its network mask is pointing to a /24 subnet, not a /27 subnet.
> 194.64.165.30/27 isn't valid either, nor is 194.64.165.225/27.

The last RFC that said that dated from like 1982 (the original IP subnetting
RFC). 16 years later, this way of viewing things is _quite_ obsolete.

-Phil
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) Pool summary not working, any ideas?

From: ascend@digistar.com

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Pool summary not working, any ideas? (fwd)
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Why TNT?
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Pool summary not working, any ideas?
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Pool summary not working, any ideas?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread