Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) Pool summary not working, any ideas?
On Mon, 19 Jan 1998, William T Wilson wrote:
> > > seem to work for us. One of our pools is the first subnet in
> > > 194.64.165.0 (mask /27, 255.255.255.224). The first (useable) pool
> > > address is 194.64.165.1, pool count is 30.
> >
> > Shouldn't that be 194.64.165.32/27? 194.64.165.1/27 was illegal the last
> > time I checked.
>
> No, it's right, look closer :) He sez that his network is
> 194.64.165.0/27, which is legal. The first usable address for such a
> network IS 194.64.165.1, because x.x.x.0 is reserved.
What i'm saying is the first subnet is not a valid subnet.
194.64.165.0/24 and 194.64.165.1/24 are valid, where 194.64.165.1/27 isn't
because its network mask is pointing to a /24 subnet, not a /27 subnet.
194.64.165.30/27 isn't valid either, nor is 194.64.165.225/27.
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
Follow-Ups:
References: