Re: (ASCEND) Pool summary not working, any ideas?

To: ascend@digistar.com
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Pool summary not working, any ideas?
From: William T Wilson <fluffy@dunadan.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 1998 01:51:22 -0500 (EST)
cc: "Oliver J. Albrecht" <oj@nexus.flensbone.net>, ascend-users@bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980118215511.16119D-100000@digistar.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

On Sun, 18 Jan 1998 ascend@digistar.com wrote:

> > seem to work for us. One of our pools is the first subnet in
> > 194.64.165.0 (mask /27, 255.255.255.224). The first (useable) pool
> > address is 194.64.165.1, pool count is 30.
> 
> Shouldn't that be 194.64.165.32/27?  194.64.165.1/27 was illegal the last
> time I checked. 

No, it's right, look closer :)  He sez that his network is
194.64.165.0/27, which is legal.  The first usable address for such a
network IS 194.64.165.1, because x.x.x.0 is reserved.

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

Follow-Ups:

Re: (ASCEND) Pool summary not working, any ideas?

From: ascend@digistar.com

References:

Re: (ASCEND) Pool summary not working, any ideas?

From: ascend@digistar.com

Prev by Date: (ASCEND) Q: "unique" Session ID
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) MAX 4048 + 5.0Ap38 oddity
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Pool summary not working, any ideas?
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Pool summary not working, any ideas?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread