Re: (ASCEND) Very different Ethernet x Wan data(?!)

["Ricardo Freire" <ricardo@allways.com.br>]

No, I never got an answer for this behavior.
I think Matt or someone else from Ascend should explain it definitely for
all of us.
I cannot understand this silence about it.

Cheers,
Ricardo

-----Mensagem original-----


>Did you ever get an answer to this?  I have a 6000 with 6.1.24 and it's
>doing the same thing.  I've also noticed that "Dual Slot T1" also shows up
>as not installed, even though the second two T1's work fine.
>
>Thanks.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ricardo Freire [SMTP:ricardo@allways.com.br]
>Sent: Saturday, April 17, 1999 11:47 AM
>To: ascend-users@bungi.com
>Subject: (ASCEND) Very different Ethernet x Wan data(?!)
>
>Hi,
>
>
>- MAX6000, 7.0.4
>- Linked to a switch at 100Mb full duplex;
>- Only analog calls (no ISDN, no OSPF).
>
>Is someone else getting these values for Ethernet interface versus Wan
>Ports?
>
>
>90-300 WAN Stat         | |90-400 Ether Stat     |
>>Rx Pkt:  103175787^ | |>Rx Pkt:   50687905 |
> Tx Pkt:      49187951   | | Tx Pkt:          27119  |
>    CRC:                  0v    | |    Col:                     0  |
>
>
>As you can see, the ratio Rx:Tx in the Wan lines is 2:1, while in the
>Ethernet is about 2000:1.
>
>When it was 10M half-duplex, the figures in Ethernet had always the same
>"size" - TX were even a little bigger than Rx. Wan Stat had the same
>behavior: Rx:Tx was always 2:1.
>
>Some clues?
>
>Best Regards,
>Ricardo Freire
>
>
>
>++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
>To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
>To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>