RE: (ASCEND) GRF implementations

["James M Bass Esq." <jbass@FASTRANS.COM>]

I did one with a GRF400, with 2 OC-3 cards(new rev), and an
Ethernet10/100
card without any problems... (IP,ATM,BGP,etc)...  The only issue I have
is
with the filters...  They work fine, BUT for SOME reason, quake (believe
it or
not) doesn't work with ANY filter installed.  I think it is a bug in the

filterd software...  If you put ANY filter in (Lets say, deny port 4444
to
host A) you get ICMP reassembly time exceeded in transit errors (Not
even
to the host specified in the filterd.conf!)...  It is a nominal problem
that is kinda annoying, but otherwise, in my mind, it is a great router,
and has VERY NOTICEABLY helped speed the network in which it was
installed.

-----Original Message-----
From: Joe [mailto:joe_howarth@ins.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 1998 6:40 PM
To: ascend-users@bungi.com
Subject: (ASCEND) GRF implementations


Anyone done any major GRF implementations?
And, did you experience any significant issues in the process or
aftermath?

Just an informational request here.
Thanks!

joe_howarth@ins.com 
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

Follow-Ups:

• Re: (ASCEND) GRF implementations
• From: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@DOMINO.ORG>

---

• Prev by Date: RE: (ASCEND) caller id on PRI
• Next by Date: RE: (ASCEND) caller id on PRI
• Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) GRF implementations
• Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) GRF implementations
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread