Re: (ASCEND) GRF implementations

To: "James M Bass Esq." <jbass@fastrans.com>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) GRF implementations
From: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@DOMINO.ORG>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 1998 11:49:09 +0000
cc: ascend-users@bungi.com, "'Joe'" <joe_howarth@ins.com>, neil@DOMINO.ORG
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 26 Mar 1998 13:24:01 CST." <EFED58137FA1D111898E00A0C933146838EC@medusa.fastrans.net>
Reply-To: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@DOMINO.ORG>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

On Thu, 26 Mar 1998 13:24:01 -0600 
 "James M Bass Esq." <jbass@FASTRANS.COM> wrote:

> I did one with a GRF400, with 2 OC-3 cards(new rev), and an
> Ethernet10/100
> card without any problems... (IP,ATM,BGP,etc)...  The only issue I have
> is
> with the filters...  They work fine, BUT for SOME reason, quake (believe
> it or
> not) doesn't work with ANY filter installed.  I think it is a bug in the
> 
> filterd software...  If you put ANY filter in (Lets say, deny port 4444
> to
> host A) you get ICMP reassembly time exceeded in transit errors (Not
> even
> to the host specified in the filterd.conf!)...  It is a nominal problem
> that is kinda annoying, but otherwise, in my mind, it is a great router,
> and has VERY NOTICEABLY helped speed the network in which it was
> installed.
> 

Yup, that is one thing, the filtering on the GRF is well below par.

--
Neil J. McRae. Alive and Kicking.     
neil@DOMINO.ORG    NetBSD-1.3 released! ftp://ftp.uk.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD
  Free the daemon in your <A HREF="http://www.NetBSD.ORG/">computer!</A>

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

RE: (ASCEND) GRF implementations

From: "James M Bass Esq." <jbass@FASTRANS.COM>

Prev by Date: (ASCEND) Problems with 6.0.2 on MAX4000
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) caller id on PRI
Prev by thread: RE: (ASCEND) GRF implementations
Next by thread: (ASCEND) Ascend P50 --> Max 4048
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread