Re: (ASCEND) In Defense Of Ascend...

To: Robert Fournerat <robert@netin.com>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) In Defense Of Ascend...
From: William T Wilson <fluffy@dunadan.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 1998 15:58:49 -0500 (EST)
cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <3516AD98.8B582C57@netin.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

On Mon, 23 Mar 1998, Robert Fournerat wrote:

> 5) And speaking of the "UDP port 9" problem, could some informed
>    and responsible source at Ascend please tell us what Ascend
>    did to fix this dilemma.  I don't trust Ascend's declaration
>    (without an explanation) that it is fixed. I hope it is very
>    obvious why we need this information.

Although I wholeheartedly agree with the majority of your post (especially
the portions about Microcentrism) the fixes released by Ascend do appear
to work.  And I'm glad they got them out in a matter of days instead of
weeks or months like they used to.

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) In Defense Of Ascend...

From: Robert Fournerat <robert@netin.com>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) More Fatal Errors!
Next by Date: (ASCEND) Callbacks
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) In Defense Of Ascend...
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) In Defense Of Ascend...
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread