Re: (ASCEND) In Defense Of Ascend...

[Jason Nealis <nealis@babylon.erols.com>]

> 5) And speaking of the "UDP port 9" problem, could some informed
>    and responsible source at Ascend please tell us what Ascend
>    did to fix this dilemma.  I don't trust Ascend's declaration
>    (without an explanation) that it is fixed. I hope it is very
>    obvious why we need this information.

 Ouch, Harsh message, (But it needed to be said), In regards to UDP port 
9. I have loaded up Ap46 and there seems to be no issues as of yet
with the OS, I deployed it on approx 500 boxes last night, If things 
start to break, I'll be sure to post them here :)

Jason Nealis
Director Internet Operations
Network Access
Erols Internet



> 
> thanks,
> Robert
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
> 

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

References:

• Re: (ASCEND) In Defense Of Ascend...
• From: Robert Fournerat <robert@netin.com>

---

• Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Ascend Max 40xx and v.90 [Q]
• Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) 64k ISDN via T3?
• Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) In Defense Of Ascend...
• Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) In Defense Of Ascend...
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread