Re: (ASCEND) SNMP for Max4004

To: Brett Hawn <blh@texas.net>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) SNMP for Max4004
From: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@DOMINO.ORG>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 1998 14:51:45 +0000
cc: Matt Holdrege <matt@ascend.com>, ascend-users@bungi.com, neil@DOMINO.ORG
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 14 Jan 1998 07:52:20 CST." <19980114075220.52291@texas.net>
Reply-To: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@DOMINO.ORG>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

On Wed, 14 Jan 1998 07:52:20 -0600 
 Brett Hawn <blh@texas.net> wrote:

> even listening sockets take some cpu and memory, and the 4004 is lacking in
> both, always has been. Not to mention both are still piss poor methods, mine
> however is much more scalable.
> 

Why is it "much more scalable"?

Regards,
Neil.
--
Neil J. McRae. Alive and Kicking.     
neil@DOMINO.ORG    NetBSD-1.3 released! ftp://ftp.uk.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD
  Free the daemon in your <A HREF="http://www.NetBSD.ORG/">computer!</A>

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) SNMP for Max4004

From: Brett Hawn <blh@texas.net>

Prev by Date: (ASCEND) Quiescenting PRIs
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) SNMP for Max4004
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) SNMP for Max4004
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) SNMP for Max4004
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread