Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) SNMP for Max4004
even listening sockets take some cpu and memory, and the 4004 is lacking in
both, always has been. Not to mention both are still piss poor methods, mine
however is much more scalable.
On Wed, Jan 14, 1998 at 04:16:03AM -0800, Matt Holdrege made some electrons appear in the following form:
> At 03:56 AM 1/14/98 -0600, Brett Hawn wrote:
> >Considering whats involved in using 'cexample' its a poor solution. I'm not
> >going to waste cpu cycles on all my maxen to run a radius server on them
> >just so I can do something that is functionally missing from the Max in the
> >first place. As it stands now I'm having to log the session ID, have a perl
> >script I wrote wander over to the max, drop into term serv and boot them
> >that way.
>
> I don't understand the part about wasting CPU cycles. All the Max Radius
> Server is doing is listening on a port. It doesn't use any cycles until a
> message comes in. Then it kills or alters the session. It's far better than
> kludging up telnet in a perl script.
>
> Matt Holdrege http://www.ascend.com matt@ascend.com
--
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
Follow-Ups:
References: