Re: (ASCEND) Zombie Routes

[Phillip Vandry <vandry@Mlink.NET>]

> >Zombie routes are harmless. They aren't in the active routing table (or
> >at least they aren't used for routing packets), but they haven't yet
> >been deleted from the table by (I assume) a periodic table maintenance
> >process.
> >
> >The last column is not an idle counter, it's just a measure of how old the
> >route is. If you find the values to be high, that coincides with the
> >assertion that these routes are old and no longer used :-)
> 
> Sure. But what if this route is defined within radius as a static
> route for dialout? In case I hangup the user's session, the zombie-route

With route-maxname-nn? If so, then I guess you're right, the routes should
remain in the active routing table! In that case, maybe you can try a
local profile as a workaround?

-Phil
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>