Re: (ASCEND) Can I busy ports on a 4048 for testing purposes

To: Mike Hughes <mike@dircon.net>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Can I busy ports on a 4048 for testing purposes
From: Brian Uechi <brianu@lava.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 1998 21:59:09 -1000 (HST)
cc: "Ascend-Users@Bungi. Com" <ascend-users@bungi.com>
In-Reply-To: <199804271539.QAA12970@mailhost.dircon.co.uk>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

On Mon, 27 Apr 1998, Mike Hughes wrote:

> On 27 Apr 98 at 2:29, Brian Uechi wrote:
> 
> > won't be happy. Quiescing the lines work much better. It busies out
> > idle lines but leaves callers connected. Remaining lines are busied
> > out as callers hang up.
> > 
> > Net/T1 > Line Config -> config name -> 1st Line -> Quiesced
> 
> Excuse me if this is a dumb question, but is there any way of Ascend 
> implementing this on an E1/PRI, or is there something in E1 that 
> stops you doing it?

I've only used this on T1/PRI. Perhaps Ascend support answer this
one. Also the CO switch may have to be provisioned to allow you to
put lines out of service.

---
Brian K. Uechi                 Email: brianu@lava.net
Technical Support Engineer     Phone: 808-545-5282
LavaNet, Inc.                  FAX  : 808-545-7020

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) Can I busy ports on a 4048 for testing purposes

From: "Mike Hughes" <mike@dircon.net>

Prev by Date: RE: (ASCEND) Big modem pool
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) New Max/TNT/Pipeline HTML docs (fwd)
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Can I busy ports on a 4048 for testing purposes
Next by thread: (ASCEND) New syslog messages
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread