Re: [VANILLA-LIST:2847] The r.g.n ejection debate

To: vanilla-list@us.netrek.org
Subject: Re: [VANILLA-LIST:2847] The r.g.n ejection debate
From: Tom Holub <doosh@best.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2000 12:27:04 -0800
In-Reply-To: <20000129135921.A15964@isis.visi.com>; from sheldon@visi.com on Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 01:59:21PM -0600
References: <20000128201807.A25665@shell3.ba.best.com> <200001291550.e0TFobZ14659@denali.ccs.neu.edu> <20000129082343.A938@shell3.ba.best.com> <20000129135921.A15964@isis.visi.com>

On Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 01:59:21PM -0600, sheldon wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 08:23:43AM -0800, Tom Holub wrote:
> > This proposal will HELP the new players, not hurt them.  You're just being
> > a moron.
> 
>  Ok, let me get this straight...
> 
>  Tom finally begins to come to his senses and realizes that cluecheck and
> eject have not been a healthy thing for netrek.

That's not my position at all.  I think eject is extremely healthy.  I
have never been a supporter of cluecheck messages.
 -Tom

References:
- Re: [VANILLA-LIST:2847] The r.g.n ejection debate
  - From: Tom Holub <doosh@best.com>
- Re: [VANILLA-LIST:2847] The r.g.n ejection debate
  - From: Jeffrey Nowakowski <jeffno@ccs.neu.edu>
- Re: [VANILLA-LIST:2847] The r.g.n ejection debate
  - From: Tom Holub <doosh@best.com>
- Re: [VANILLA-LIST:2847] The r.g.n ejection debate
  - From: sheldon <sheldon@visi.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [VANILLA-LIST:2847] The r.g.n ejection debate
Next by Date: Re: [VANILLA-LIST:2847] The r.g.n ejection debate
Prev by thread: Re: [VANILLA-LIST:2847] The r.g.n ejection debate
Next by thread: Re: [VANILLA-LIST:2847] The r.g.n ejection debate
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread