RE: [TCLUG:14271] ext3

["Thomas.Veldhouse (Exchange)" <Thomas.Veldhouse@target.com>]

ext2 might work as well if you mount everything synchronisly (option sync).
However, I/O performance becomes a bit of a dog - depending upon the
application you are using it for.  If I were running a database, I would
want sync and let the database handle the buffering.

Tom Veldhouse
veldy@visi.com

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Yaron <jethro@yaron.org>
To: TCLUG <tclug-list@mn-linux.org>
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2000 1:29 PM
Subject: [TCLUG:14271] ext3


>   Hi,
> 
> I've been waiting for this for quite a while! (:
> 
> I don't know how many of you experienced the Big Power Outage we had up
> here in Roseville/Shoreview about an hour or so ago. I have ext3 running
> on my box at work, and it SURVIVED INTACT WITHOUT FSCKing!!! Yeah!!!!! (:
> 
> Just had to share. I love journaling filesystems. It worked _better_ than
> the docs say!
> 
> 
> -Yaron
> 
> --
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tclug-list-unsubscribe@mn-linux.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tclug-list-help@mn-linux.org
>