Re: (ASCEND) packets vs. collesions?

To: "Jim Jones, Jr." <jimslists@arcomcontrols.com>, <ascend-users@bungi.com>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) packets vs. collesions?
From: Matthew Smith <m@mmsnet.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 03 May 2000 05:20:00 +0100
In-Reply-To: <004201bfb49f$f9295ae0$1eb55e18@name>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10005021947080.18291-100000@buffnet11.buffnet.net>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

Depends what you have attached to the Ethernet port.

If it is a shared ethernet topology, then no it might not be normal.
If it is a switched etherenet topology, then yes it is normal.

-M

At 08:36 PM 5/2/00 -0500, Jim Jones, Jr. wrote:
>Is it normal to have so many packets and so few collesions?
>
>
>
>90-400 Ether Stat
>>Rx Pkt:   73374032
> Tx Pkt:   65658038
>    Col:          0
>
>
>Jim
>
>++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
>To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
>To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
>
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:
- Re: (ASCEND) MAX 4K/6K CODE
  - From: Steve Hovey <shovey@buffnet.net>
- (ASCEND) packets vs. collesions?
  - From: "Jim Jones, Jr." <jimslists@arcomcontrols.com>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) IP/IPX with Pipeline 50
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) MAX 4K/6K CODE
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) packets vs. collesions?
Next by thread: RE: (ASCEND) MAX 4K/6K CODE
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread