RE: (ASCEND) PRI

["Troy Settle" <st@i-Plus.net>]

I don't know if PRI is more stable than channelized T1, but I do know that
back in the day of v34, our customers' connection speeds went up drasticly
when we switched from CT1 to PRI.  I don't know what, if any, difference it
would make with V90.

As for not being able to deliver BRI, I don't know if this is normal.  Our
market covers some fairly rural areas, and as far as I know, BRI is
availiable throughout our entire coverage area.

If you live in a fairly flat area, you might want to consider going wireless
as a highspeed access alternative.


HTH,

--
  Troy Settle
  iPlus Internet Services


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com
> [mailto:owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com]On Behalf Of Butch Evans
> Sent: Saturday, October 30, 1999 9:54 PM
> To: ascend-users@bungi.com
> Subject: (ASCEND) PRI
>
>
> I have been told that a PRI is a much better (more stable) type of circuit
> (over a "normal" T1).  Can anyone confirm this, or send me information on
> where to see a comparison?  BTW, the local Telco has PRI, but cannot
> provide BRI.  Is that common? (we are in a pretty remote area)
>
> --
>
> Butch Evans
> Network Admin
> Shelton Internet, Inc.
> Malden, MO
> 800-339-4803  276-4803
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>