Re: (ASCEND) null route for disconnected dial-up users?

To: boland@diva.nl (Michiel Boland)
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) null route for disconnected dial-up users?
From: Stephen Mulrine <skm@foremost.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 15:32:45 +0100 (BST)
Cc: skm@foremost.co.uk, ascend-users@bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9910201549560.11404-100000@carmel.diva.nl> from "Michiel Boland" at Oct 20, 99 03:54:17 pm
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

Michiel Boland wrote:
>Ascend has a semi-hack for this. It has two interfaces, rj0 and bh0, with
>addresses 127.0.0.2 and 127.0.0.3, respectively. Any packet sent to rj0
>will cause an ICMP unreachable, while packets to bh0 are simply dropped on
>the floor. So you can either set up a 'null route' to 127.0.0.2 or
>127.0.0.3, doesn't make much difference.

This appears to be exactly what I'm looking for.  Thanks!

Stephen
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:
- Re: (ASCEND) null route for disconnected dial-up users?
  - From: Michiel Boland <boland@diva.nl>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) More static routes on Pipelines
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) max 6k mppp
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) null route for disconnected dial-up users?
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) null route for disconnected dial-up users?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread