Real Time Ascend Maling List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(ASCEND) Re: Re: OSPF trouble
> As far I know there is a problem with Link State Advertisments in
new OSPF
> code (introduced in 7.0), when route to the same destination is
already
> defined on another router in the area (one Max has a dialout
profile,
> another Max recives incoming call for example).
> In that case Max sends out only host route not the network route.
This
Ok. That would be good enough for me.
It doesn't seem to work.
I'm using radius to assign fixed-ip-adresses to some of my
customers. The maxes assign this nicely to the caller.
The only problem is that the connected cisco3620 should be aware
of the location of this calling customer to route the ip-traffic.
At this moment I don't see any information on the cisco concerning
this and on the other max there is no info either about this ip-adress
the calling customer has been assigned.
On the max on which the customer has dialed in the route is
displayed as fixed. No effort on putting it in the 0.0.0.0 area.
One thing to mention. The assigned ip-adres is not on the same
network as the network-interface of the max or cisco. It's a
completely different subnet.
> problem doesnt exist in 6.1.24 which use old OSPF code. I don't
know if this
> is the problem in your case in can't find enought information about
your
> network setup in your mail.
>
> Al
>
>
> >From: "Edwin Ringersma" <edwin@introweb.nl>
> >To: "Azzo ." <acrossnik@hotmail.com>
> >CC: ascend-users@bungi.com
> >Subject: Re: (ASCEND) OSPF troubles
> >Date: Fri, 15 Oct 1999 10:39:42 +0200
> >
> > > The most important question is what is the software version
runining on
> >Max
> > > units?
> > > Do you have the same Problem with 6.1.24?
> >I haven't tried that.
> >They're running 7.0.4. with stacking. No problems so far. One
max
> >has been running for about a year. The second one is new.
> > >
> > > Al
> > >
> > >
> > > >From: "Edwin Ringersma" <edwin@introweb.nl>
> > > >To: ascend-users@bungi.com
> > > >Subject: (ASCEND) OSPF troubles
> > > >Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 18:22:32 +0200
> > > >
> > > >Hello,
> > > >
> > > >It seems that some routes don't get passed to other ospf
router.
> > > >I've configured a Cisco3620 and 2 max6000 to use ospf.
> > > >They use simple authentication because md5 doesn't work.
(I don't
> > > >have a clue why but that's not the biggest problem).
> > > >Here is some information from the 3620 (Hengelo).
> > > >Hengelo>sho ip ospf neighbor
> > > >
> > > >Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address
> > > >Interface
> > > >195.86.14.68 5 FULL/DROTHER 00:00:32
195.86.14.68
> > > >FastEthernet1/
> > > >0
> > > >195.86.14.76 5 FULL/BDR 00:00:33
195.86.14.76
> > > >FastEthernet1/
> > > >0
> > > >Hengelo>sho ip ospf int fastethernet 1/0
> > > >FastEthernet1/0 is up, line protocol is up
> > > > Internet Address 195.86.14.69/25, Area 0.0.0.0
> > > > Process ID 10, Router ID 195.86.51.149, Network Type
> > > >BROADCAST, Cost: 1
> > > > Transmit Delay is 1 sec, State DR, Priority 2
> > > > Designated Router (ID) 195.86.51.149, Interface address
> > > >195.86.14.69
> > > > Backup Designated router (ID) 195.86.14.76, Interface
address
> > > >195.86.14.76
> > > > Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 40, Wait 40,
Retransmit
> > > >5
> > > > Hello due in 00:00:02
> > > > Neighbor Count is 2, Adjacent neighbor count is 2
> > > > Adjacent with neighbor 195.86.14.68
> > > > Adjacent with neighbor 195.86.14.76 (Backup
Designated
> > > >Router)
> > > > Suppress hello for 0 neighbor(s)
> > > >Hengelo>
> > > >
> > > >On the max I can see this:
> > > >ascend% sho ospf rtab
> > > >DTyp RType Destination Area Cost Flags Next
hop(s)
> > > > IfNu
> > > >m
> > > >RTE FIX 0.0.0.0/0 - 1 0x100
> >195.86.14.69
> > > >197
> > > >RTE FIX 195.86.14.192/27 - 1 0x1
0.0.0.197
> > > >197
> > > >RTE OSPF 195.86.14.0/25 0.0.0.0 1 0x1
0.0.0.0
> > > > 0
> > > >RTE NONE 195.86.14.0/24 - 0 0x2 None
> > > >-
> > > >1
> > > >RTE OSPF 195.86.14.76/32 0.0.0.0 0 0x1
0.0.0.197
> > > > 197
> > > >RTE OSPF 195.86.14.68/32 0.0.0.0 1 0x201
> > > >195.86.14.68 0
> > > >RTE FIX 195.86.99.209/32 - 2 0x81 0.0.0.197
> > > >197
> > > >RTE FIX 195.86.14.163/32 - 2 0x81 0.0.0.197
> > > >197
> > > >
> > > >The ip-adres I'm particularly interested in getting to the other
> >routers
> > > >is 195.86.99.209 in this example.
> > > >Does anybody have a clue what may cause the problem ?
> > > >Configuration is as suggested in:
> > >
>http://aos.ascend.com/aos:/gennavviewer.html?doc_id=0900253d80
0
> > > >069e0&doc_header=terminal
> > > >
With regards,
Edwin Ringersma
MCSE, System Administrator
--------------------------------------------------------
IntroWeb Postbus 724 7550 AS Hengelo
Tel: 074 - 243 01 05 Welbergweg 30
Fax: 074 - 242 98 95 7556 PE Hengelo
http://www.introweb.nl Holland
--------------------------------------------------------
Internet Access & Corporate Internet Solutions
--------------------------------------------------------
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>