Ascend Archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (ASCEND) Anyone get a Cisco 1004 ISDN to connect using NAT??

To: rogers@axs4u.net, ascend-users@max.bungi.com
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Anyone get a Cisco 1004 ISDN to connect using NAT??
From: "Kevin A. Smith" <kevin@ascend.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 1998 18:08:28 -0800
In-Reply-To: <199801280025.SAA07107@axs4us02.axs4u.net>
References: <2.2.32.19980127222337.01011828@pop.lyceum.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

At 06:26 PM 1/27/98 -0600, Roger Salisbury wrote:
>
>	Anyone get a Cisco 1604 to connect using NAT to a MAX??

Cisco 1604 or 1004??
The MAX side is very simple (like any dial-in assign-dynamic-IP account).


Kevin


++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) Q. Is there an inherent restriction for P75 not able to use static IP for NAT?

From: Jim Howard <jhoward@lyceum.com>

(ASCEND) Anyone get a Cisco 1004 ISDN to connect using NAT??

From: "Roger Salisbury" <rogers@axs4u.net>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Q. Is there an inherent restriction for P75 not able to use static IP for NAT?
Next by Date: (ASCEND) 1.3Ap24 for the MAX TNT
Prev by thread: (ASCEND) Anyone get a Cisco 1004 ISDN to connect using NAT??
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Q. Is there an inherent restriction for P75 not able to use static IP for NAT?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread