Re: (ASCEND) status of v.90

To: ascend@digistar.com
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) status of v.90
From: Steve Camas <stevec@liii.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 1998 17:59:35 -0400 (EDT)
cc: Jim Howard <jhoward@lyceum.com>, ascend-users@bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980424161905.26766A-100000@digistar.digistar.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

> On Fri, 24 Apr 1998, Jim Howard wrote:
> 
> > >What kind of luck has anyone had who has tried the v.90 code available for
> > >the Max 4000?  Based upon 6.0.2 i'm concerned about its reliability.
> > 
> > unfortunately we technically can't tell you.
> 

Every time someone asks about the V.90 beta code, it seems like the
response is frequently akin to "I could tell ya but I promised not to
tell... I know something you don't know -- naa naa ni naa naa... I've got
a secret... naa naa ni naa naa..."

Please, V.90 Beta ppl... don't line up and shoot me -- just kidding...

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) status of v.90

From: ascend@digistar.com

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) NAT and Ascend
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Interesting Problem
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) status of v.90
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) status of v.90
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread