Re: (ASCEND) Max-4000 E1/T1

To: <mick@iprolink.ch>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Max-4000 E1/T1
From: Matt Holdrege <matt@ascend.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 1998 00:01:53 -0700
Cc: <ascend-users@max.bungi.com>
In-Reply-To: <001501bd6c27$7e54c150$177cf70a@rat.hq.iprolink.ch>
References: <199804200545.WAA03314@max.bungi.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

At 08:42 AM 4/20/98 +0200, Mickey Coggins wrote:
>> E1 is a much cleaner design compared to T1. While T1 uses some esoteric
>...
>> It's obviously been designed after some years of observation of T1 and
>> made better ;)
> 
>While these things are true, one thing the E1 spec seems to have left off
>is the ability to quiese a PRI!
>
>It would be really cool if Ascend could somehow trick the switch into
>thinking that all lines are in use, as a workaround for this omission.

We actually are working on a trick. The difficult thing is it involves
talking to the carriers SS7 network. Most ISP's can't do that...Yet.

Matt Holdrege		http://www.ascend.com	matt@ascend.com
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) Max-4000 E1/T1

From: "Mickey Coggins" <mick@iprolink.ch>

Prev by Date: (ASCEND) Multilink using BSDI3.0
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Max-4000 E1/T1
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Max-4000 E1/T1
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Max-4000 E1/T1
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread