Re: (ASCEND) Max-4000 E1/T1

To: <ascend-users@max.bungi.com>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Max-4000 E1/T1
From: "Mickey Coggins" <mick@iprolink.ch>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 1998 08:42:31 +0200
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <199804200545.WAA03314@max.bungi.com>
Reply-To: <mick@iprolink.ch>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

> E1 is a much cleaner design compared to T1. While T1 uses some esoteric
...
> It's obviously been designed after some years of observation of T1 and
> made better ;)
 
While these things are true, one thing the E1 spec seems to have left off
is the ability to quiese a PRI!

It would be really cool if Ascend could somehow trick the switch into
thinking that all lines are in use, as a workaround for this omission.

--
Mickey
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

Follow-Ups:

Re: (ASCEND) Max-4000 E1/T1

From: Andre Beck <beck@ibh.de>

Re: (ASCEND) Max-4000 E1/T1

From: Matt Holdrege <matt@ascend.com>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Max-4000 E1/T1
Next by Date: (ASCEND) Multicasting on Pipelines
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Max-4000 E1/T1
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Max-4000 E1/T1
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread