Re: (ASCEND) Max not routing (fwd)

[Jake Messinger <jake@ams.com>]

On Mon, 19 Apr 1999, MegaZone wrote:

:Once upon a time Jake Messinger shaped the electrons to say...
:>subnet as a couple of Lucent PM 3's. So anyway, I have the users set up in
:>radius to get a framed address of 255.255.255.255 so it assigns an address
:
:I think you typo'd that, since I know you know better. :-)
:255.255.255.254 is the value to assign an IP, 255.255.255.255 lets the user
:pick their own IP.

Yah yah.. I typoed. Its 254.
:
:>win 98 box dialing in and it claims that the netmask is 255.255.255.0. Why
:>is it doing this?? There should be no netmask.
:
:That's windows.  Remember, PPP does not say anything about netmasks, and
:windows will just stick on a netmask.

Hrm, well should I care? Is that my problem then?

:>things? Can I not assign remote ips on the max that are considered local to
:>its ethernet? Do I have to put the max in a different subnet than the ip
:>addresses I assign to the dial in users?
:
:You should be able to assign IPs that reside within the same subnet as the
:ethernet interface.

Well right, like the PM 3's work. But it doesnt seem to work on the Max.
SHouldnt it inject a /32 route into the max's route table as soon as the
remote connection is made, just like on a PM 3? Its not doing this.

~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
Jake Messinger, VP.	ph:713-772-6690			Lucent Dealer
AMS, Inc.		fx:713-774-3498 		Medical Billing
8300 Bissonnet  #400	jake@ams.com , ICQ# 4403734	Internet Services
Houston, Texas  77074	www.ams.com/~jake		 and Hardware

Adjunct Professor	University of Houston, CBA	 jake@uh.edu
~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~

		INVENTOR OF the _.,-*~''~*-,._ SQUIGGLES (c) 1978

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>