Re: (ASCEND) Max not routing

[Anthony Chatman <anthony@edge.net>]

Couple of quick things, try to make sure the win 98 machine does not
have a dialup networking config that forces the netmask as 255.255.255.0
for the dialup networking profile you use to connect with the max. (You
probably have verified this already). Take a look at the max and see if
it has RIP enabled, normally RIP send v2 will be sufficent on some
networks. Try checking the router to make sure the routes are entered
correctly. And of course with a user connected to the max unit, try
doing a traceroute on the ip, that should tell you if anything at which
point the routing appears to end.


Jake Messinger wrote:
> 
> Hi.
> 
> I set up a max 1800 this weekend and I must be doing something stupid
> because I cant get it to route correctly.
> 
> Its on a /26 subnet at address x.y.z.180 and I have set the pool to assign
> addresses starting at 181 which it gladly does. The max is on the same
> subnet as a couple of Lucent PM 3's. So anyway, I have the users set up in
> radius to get a framed address of 255.255.255.255 so it assigns an address
> which it does, and I also have framed netmask to 255.255.255.255.
> 
> The user logs in, authenticates, etc... and can get to the gateway router at
> x.y.z.1 (its not on the same subnet as the max 1800), but I cannot access
> any other ip addresses within the same /26 subnet, such as the other 2 pm
> 3's. The only thing I can access is the max itself. I did a winpifg on a
> win 98 box dialing in and it claims that the netmask is 255.255.255.0. Why
> is it doing this?? There should be no netmask.
> 
> I did some experimentation and if I enter a route on a linux box on the
> same subnet, from itself to the assigned ip address for a diales in session,
> then the remote session can access the linux box. Its like there is no route
> to the local subnet, but from the max box, I can access everything.
> 
> Am I doing something wrong that is different from the way Livingston does
> things? Can I not assign remote ips on the max that are considered local to
> its ethernet? Do I have to put the max in a different subnet than the ip
> addresses I assign to the dial in users?
> 
> ~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
> Jake Messinger, VP.     ph:713-772-6690                 Lucent Dealer
> AMS, Inc.               fx:713-774-3498                 Medical Billing
> 8300 Bissonnet  #400    jake@ams.com , ICQ# 4403734     Internet Services
> Houston, Texas  77074   www.ams.com/~jake                and Hardware
> 
> Adjunct Professor       University of Houston, CBA       jake@uh.edu
> ~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
> 
>                 INVENTOR OF the _.,-*~''~*-,._ SQUIGGLES (c) 1978
> 
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd:   <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>