Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

(ASCEND) use of ip pools in testing

I think the proper attribute is:

Ascend-Assign-IP-Pool = 0

I have heard that this is not documented anywhere, but that it works.

Hope this helps,

Todd A. Blank
Columbus NAP, Inc.

	-----Original Message-----
	From:	Michael Johnson [SMTP:mjohnson@ou.edu]
<mailto:[SMTP:mjohnson@ou.edu]> 
	Sent:	Tuesday, October 13, 1998 12:30 PM
	To:	ascend-users@bungi.com <mailto:ascend-users@bungi.com> 
	Subject:	(ASCEND) use of ip pools in testing


	I have the following pools configured on my MAXTNT (2.1.9)

	admin> ip-pools

	Pool#                Base         Count      InUse
	   1            ###.###.###.128     126          0
	   2            ###.###.###.128     126          0

	 Number of remaining allocated addresses:    0

	I have used several modems to test with before I go production
and I have
	noticed the tnt allocated me each ip address in order each time
I logged in.
	But, it only went through the first pool and then started over.
It didn't
	jump from one pool to the next pool.

	In the DEFAULT user on radius, I did not specify which pool to
use, because
	I assumed that if I didn't specify it would use both or either.
Is there a
	way I can specify multiple pools?

	Is this assumption correct?  When I have a full load can I
expect it to
	properly use the second pool even though it didn't when I was
testing?


	++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
	To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to
ascend-users-request@bungi.com <mailto:ascend-users-request@bungi.com> 
	To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq
<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq> >
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>