Ascend Archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RH Linux tricks (was Re: (ASCEND) In Defense Of Ascend...)

To: Joe Portman <baron@ws4.aa.net>
Subject: Re: RH Linux tricks (was Re: (ASCEND) In Defense Of Ascend...)
From: Richard Johnsson <johnsson@interval.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 1998 12:03:10 -0800
Cc: ascend-users@max.bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.980328114236.19138A-100000@ws4.aa.net>
References: <3.0.32.19980328111335.011fcf18@mail2.honeycomb.net>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

At 11:43 AM 3/28/98 -0800, Joe Portman wrote:
>Netaps are DESIGNED to run 99.9999% uptime, iE about 10 minutes a YEAR
>of downtime, including repairs.

Actually 99.9999% uptime would be only 31 seconds of downtime per year. :-)

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

Follow-Ups:

Re: RH Linux tricks (was Re: (ASCEND) In Defense Of Ascend...)

From: William T Wilson <fluffy@dunadan.com>

References:

RH Linux tricks (was Re: (ASCEND) In Defense Of Ascend...)

From: Scott Kozicki <SKozicki@bluestar.net>

Re: RH Linux tricks (was Re: (ASCEND) In Defense Of Ascend...)

From: Joe Portman <baron@ws4.aa.net>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Hi im Sandra
Next by Date: Re: RH Linux tricks (was Re: (ASCEND) In Defense Of Ascend...)
Prev by thread: Re: RH Linux tricks (was Re: (ASCEND) In Defense Of Ascend...)
Next by thread: Re: RH Linux tricks (was Re: (ASCEND) In Defense Of Ascend...)
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread