Re: (ASCEND) Kudo's to Engineering.

To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Kudo's to Engineering.
From: Manfred Kwiatkowski <Kwiatkowski@zrz.TU-Berlin.DE>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 1998 10:35:42 +0100 (MET)
In-Reply-To: <no.id> from "Jason Nealis" at Mar 12, 98 04:45:36 pm
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

>  Why is this? If the client fails to negotiate V.90, Shouldn't the client
> then fall back to K56? or is it because the RAS/NAS negotiates KFLEX first
> by the time the client falls back to K56 the RAS/NAS has already fallen
> back to V.34? (am I close?)

Rockwell economy hardware can only handle a singele 56k protocol at a time.

-- 
Manfred Kwiatkowski, ZRZ (Zentraleinrichtung Rechenzentrum), Sekr.: EN 50,
Technische Universitaet Berlin, Einsteinufer 17, D-10587 Berlin, GERMANY.
INTERNET: kwiatkowski@zrz.TU-Berlin.DE             phone: +49 30 314 24355
X.400: s=kwiatkowski ou=zrz p=tu-berlin a=d400 c=de  fax: +49 30 314 21060
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) PPP fails?
Next by Date: (ASCEND) PPP fails?
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Kudo's to Engineering.
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Kudo's to Engineering.
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread