Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) 6.0.0 eik.m40 memory leak?
On Wed, Mar 04, 1998 at 07:06:46PM +0000, Oliver J. Albrecht wrote:
> In article <34FC903E.6AF4A13C@1earth.net> you wrote:
>
> > > pools -v
> >Validating free lists...
> >0 errors; 390 buffers; 1162560 bytes memory free
> > >
> >Previusly we would have over 1.5mb with the same amount of users.
>
> I finally went back to 5.0Ap42 today, after 3 days of running
> 6.0.0 available memory was below 600K today, load was very light
> at this point (approx. 15 users). Didnīt seem right to me...
What about that:
> pools -v
Validating free lists...
0 errors; 160 buffers; 1723648 bytes memory free
^^^^^^^
Doesn't seem right, either. Reverse memory leak ? I remember that directly
after the upgrade (it's fek.m40 for that matter) it showed 1.3 MB free...
Due to the other flaws we are about to go back to 5.0Ap13 before
the weekend (don't expect a fix for the no-packets-go-out-any-longer-on-
established-connection problem we have). And the broken RIPv2 on 1800s and
2000s is a Bummer.
*Sigh*,
Andre.
--
Kanther-Line: PGP SSH IDEA MD5 GOST RIPE-MD160 3DES RSA FEAL32 RC4
+-o-+--------------------------------------------------------+-o-+
| o | \\\- Brain Inside -/// | o |
| o | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | o |
| o | Andre' Beck (ABPSoft) beck@ibh-dd.de XLink PoP Dresden | o |
+-o-+--------------------------------------------------------+-o-+
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
References: