Re: (ASCEND) 2 Max 1800's Hunt Group Question

To: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) 2 Max 1800's Hunt Group Question
From: Phillip Vandry <vandry@Mlink.NET>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 09:36:34 -0400 (EDT)
cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 24 Sep 1997 22:47:28 EDT." <3.0.1.32.19970924224728.00a25318@mktg_srv.ascend.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

> Of course with RIP's inherent update delays (is RIPv2 the same?), a route
> learned from MAX1, could still be in a local hosts routing table when your
> client connects to MAX2.....I believe OSPF fixes this?

I have never had such problems with RIP. It updates fast when the
customer connects, and tears down the route fast (by announcing a
route with infinite metric) when the customer disconnects.

-Phil
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) 2 Max 1800's Hunt Group Question

From: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) 2 Max 1800's Hunt Group Question
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Three Retrains
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) 2 Max 1800's Hunt Group Question
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) 2 Max 1800's Hunt Group Question
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread