Re: (ASCEND) 2 Max 1800's Hunt Group Question

To: Ascend User-Group <ascend-users@bungi.com>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) 2 Max 1800's Hunt Group Question
From: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 1997 22:47:28 -0700
Cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <199709241447.KAA29738@Iodine.Mlink.NET>
References: <Your message of "Wed, 24 Sep 1997 07:46:02 EDT." <3.0.3.32.19970924074602.0392700c@carmelnet.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

At 10:47 AM 9/24/97 -0400, Phillip Vandry wrote:
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Does RIP learn the routes fast enough?
>
>Yes, it does. On the local Ethernet, the routes should be learned within a
>second of the connection coming up. If they must propagate further than
>there will of course be further delays.

Of course with RIP's inherent update delays (is RIPv2 the same?), a route
learned from MAX1, could still be in a local hosts routing table when your
client connects to MAX2.....I believe OSPF fixes this?

Kevin

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

Follow-Ups:

Re: (ASCEND) 2 Max 1800's Hunt Group Question

From: Tom Mastre <tom@carmelnet.com>

Re: (ASCEND) 2 Max 1800's Hunt Group Question

From: Phillip Vandry <vandry@Mlink.NET>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) 2 Max 1800's Hunt Group Question

From: Phillip Vandry <vandry@Mlink.NET>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) speaking of cisco...
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Three Retrains
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) 2 Max 1800's Hunt Group Question
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) 2 Max 1800's Hunt Group Question
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread