Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) 5.0Ap20 for MAX products
Yep, I'm talking about 5.0Ap20. I've loaded it on all
machines on my network. I have a variety of Max4000 and
Max4004 units. I am NOT experiencing the bug you guys are
reporting. All my detail logs show the proper user name.
I authenticate all my users from RADIUS using a UNIX-based
password file. I'm running tk.m40 using RIPv2 as my routing
protocol. Not sure what else you need -- let me know and
I'll provide it.
(I'm also running one of your newer RADIUS servers. Can't
remember the date on it but it's within the last 2 weeks.)
At 11:30 AM 8/26/97 -0700, you wrote:
>At 10:22 AM 8/26/97 -0500, John Coy wrote:
>>At 03:03 PM 8/26/97 +0200, you wrote:
>>>
>>> What were the accounting problems?
>>>
>>> Did I miss something?
>>>
>>>Yes, you apparently missed numerous reports on this list that the
>>>radius accounting replaces the User-Name by whatever "Modem n:n" the
>>>user is using.
>>>
>>I am not seeing this behavior on our RADIUS accounting logs. Is
>>there a particular load that is affected. I'm using the tk.m40
>>for both my Max4000s and Max4004s. It works fine. I am not using
>>OSPF but rather RIPv2 as a routing protocol.
>
>Just to confirm, you are talking about 5.0Ap20 - right. (Gotta be sure!).
>
>
>Kevin
>
>
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
Follow-Ups:
References: