Re: (ASCEND) Maxen ethernet port fdx or hdx?

To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Maxen ethernet port fdx or hdx?
From: Manfred Kwiatkowski <Kwiatkowski@zrz.TU-Berlin.DE>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 22:12:11 +0200 (MET DST)
In-Reply-To: <no.id> from "Joseph Bridgewater" at Aug 20, 97 04:55:10 pm
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

Joseph Bridgewater <Joseph@austintx.net> writes:
> 
> 2)  If it is only hdx, what are the implications in using a couple 4000's
> on a LAN otherwise configured to be full-duplex?

There is no such thing as a full-duplex ethernet LAN. A collection
of point-to-points links sharing a common layer-2 addressing scheme
however may be in turn brigded to any half-duplex collision domain.

:-)

-- 
Manfred Kwiatkowski, ZRZ (Zentraleinrichtung Rechenzentrum), Sekr.: EN 50,
Technische Universitaet Berlin, Einsteinufer 17, D-10587 Berlin, GERMANY.
INTERNET: kwiatkowski@zrz.TU-Berlin.DE             phone: +49 30 314 24355
X.400: s=kwiatkowski ou=zrz p=tu-berlin a=d400 c=de  fax: +49 30 314 21060
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) LOTS of c=185
Next by Date: (ASCEND) Correction - 1.3Ap5 for MAX TNT
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Maxen ethernet port fdx or hdx?
Next by thread: (ASCEND) Possible Issue with 5.0Ap6 - 50Ap16
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread