Re: (ASCEND) Max 200 Plus disappoints!

To: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Max 200 Plus disappoints!
From: Phillip Vandry <vandry@Mlink.NET>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 1997 17:55:26 -0400 (EDT)
cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 13 Aug 1997 14:39:15 EDT." <3.0.1.32.19970813143915.00bae518@mktg_srv.ascend.com>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

> That's a back-door way to connect to the MAX200+ anyway. The main way we
> designed it to be configured was with the associated configurator. It
> can talk to the MAX over the LAN and then configure it that way. Once
> configured, you can telnet to it like any other MAX product.
> 
> I guess you don't like Windows machines eh? (The configurator is a
> Windows based application).

No...

It'd be nice it it could obtain its initial address via bootp or DHCP :-)

-Phil
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) Max 200 Plus disappoints!

From: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Clock source strategy
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Callback Problems
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Max 200 Plus disappoints!
Next by thread: (ASCEND) NAT on p130 and p50/p75
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread