Re: (ASCEND) Net Medic and My Max 4K

To: Josh Bailey <joshb@xtra.co.nz>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Net Medic and My Max 4K
From: Eric Reeves <tilex@ghg.net>
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 1997 13:52:55 -0500 (CDT)
cc: Mark S Lane <mlane@3wave.com>, ascend-users@bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.970809203421.297L-100000@fell-light>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

Are there any negative side-effects that you have noticed so far?  If not,
sounds like it's the way to go.  Thanks.

+------------------------------------------+
| Eric Reeves                tilex@ghg.net |
| GHG Corporation          ereeves@ghg.net |
+------------------------------------------+

On Sat, 9 Aug 1997, Josh Bailey wrote:

> The reason it works is that echo-requests can't be buffered. Every time an
> echo-request gets transmitted, this apparently forces the Max to dequeue
> anything waiting for a particular connection.
> 
> This has the side-effect of keeping latency down.

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

Re: (ASCEND) Net Medic and My Max 4K

From: Josh Bailey <joshb@xtra.co.nz>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Pipeline 130 for remote POP
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Low bit/high bit subnets
Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Net Medic and My Max 4K
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Net Medic and My Max 4K
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread