Re: (ASCEND) Low bit/high bit subnets

[Matt Holdrege <matt@ascend.com>]

At 12:51 PM 8/9/97 -0500, Dale Botkin wrote:
>On Sat, 9 Aug 1997, John Coy wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I was wondering if the Ascend products will properly
>> route 'illegal' subnets such as the 0-bit and the high-bit
>> subnets.  For example, if I have /27 network, can I use:
>[snip]
>
>Forgive me if I demonstrate my ignorance with this, but are these not now
>"legal" subnets, with the advent of CIDR?  We set "ip classless" on our
>ciscos long ago and have been using the top and bottom subnets ever since.
>We have an x.x.x.0/27 net routed through an Max on frame relay, and
>another on a P50.  Both work as they should. 

Yep. These are now legal and supported as per RFCmumblemumble. Look it up!



Matt Holdrege  -  http://www.ascend.com  -  matt@ascend.com
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

---

References:

• (ASCEND) Low bit/high bit subnets
• From: John Coy <jcoy@arkansas.net>
• Re: (ASCEND) Low bit/high bit subnets
• From: Dale Botkin <dbotkin@probe.net>

---

• Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Net Medic and My Max 4K
• Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) RADIUS - Blocking multiple logins by same user
• Prev by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Low bit/high bit subnets
• Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Low bit/high bit subnets
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread