Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) K56 Flex "Burp Tone"
Kevin,
I wan't making a distinction between the problems. Perhaps I should have
made that more clear. As several others here have stated, it's important
that there not be new connection quality problem when migrating to the new
equipment. The V.FC issue can be solved for now with a small legacy
analog pool, but if admins are experiencing a large increase in problems
across the board then we'll need to rethink our conversion decision. It
would be foolish to go ahead with this if it's going to increase our
support load; that's the opposite of the intended result. Our
customers will be unhappy, and therefore we'll be unhappy.
Dave Wells
NetGate Internet
On Tue, 5 Aug 1997, Kevin Smith wrote:
> Date: Tue, 05 Aug 1997 15:57:37 -0700
> From: Kevin Smith <kevin@ascend.com>
> To: Dave Wells <wellsian@netgate.net>
> Cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
> Subject: Re: (ASCEND) K56 Flex "Burp Tone"
>
> At 03:08 PM 8/5/97 -0700, Dave Wells wrote:
> >Do you have any PM3's to compare this to? It would be good to know if the
> >problem is in Rockwell's code or elsewhere. We're looking forward to a
> >large migration to MAXs or PM3s in the near future, and this kind of
> >problem makes me very nervous.
>
> Which problem do you refer to here....Josh is still running the pre-K56Flex
> version of the MAX code, so does not have the latest modem code from
> Rockwell.
>
> The "burp tone" that has been referred to in the rest of the thread, is
> going to appear in both Rockwell and Lucent based K56Flex servers since
> it's part of the K56Flex 1.1 code.
>
>
> Kevin
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
Follow-Ups:
References: