On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 12:26:31AM -0600, John Ford wrote: > On 3/2/2004 11:27 PM Mark Courtney wrote: > > >I'd like to thank Mr. Adam Maloney for this valuable info. I called qwest > >and did the old switcheroo, dropped the phone number that never gets used > >(treos rock), upgraded to the 1.5 line, and I'm gonna be saving some > >dough. They're even sending me a new Actiontec to boot (for free). They > >claim that the Cisco 678 won't handle the 1.5 line. Does anybody know if > >this is true? > > > > > >Thanks again, Adam. > > No, it is *not* true. Many Qwest cust service (sales) folks will insist > that you *have* to get their Actiontec. They don't know any better. I've > seen newsgroup posts from at least a dozen folks in this area (mpls/stp) > who have a 678 training at 1536/1024 with the new DSL service. As of > tomorrow, I'll be another one. This is on a regular Qwest line with DSL. > I assume it's the same for the "naked DSL" option. > -- > jcf > I suppose I'm SOL with my Cisco 675? -- Jim Kaufman Linux Evangelist public key 0x6D802619 http://www.linuxforbusiness.net --- The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be taken seriously. -- Hubert Humphrey _______________________________________________ TCLUG Mailing List - Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota http://www.mn-linux.org tclug-list at mn-linux.org https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list