On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 03:21:02PM -0600, Matthew S. Hallacy wrote: >not. Would it be possible to pick places a little less.. anal, in the >future? Or has this been brought up before? Are people <21 not welcome >at the beer meetings? a: it's a Beer Meeting NOT a LUG meeting 2: Noone expressly picked McGoverns because of the age limit. It wasn't an issue last time. The never checked. There were people unable to imbibe and noone gave two shits. d: Of course they're gonna say that. You could be the police. > >(McGoverns told me on the phone that nobody <21 is allowed 'upstairs', >and nobody <21 is allowed to sit at a table where people are drinking) So they sit at the very next table. What's the big hang up. we'll probably occupy a couple of tables. -- Ben Lutgens | http://people.sistina.com/~blutgens/ System Administrator | http://www.sistina.com/ Sistina Software Inc. | "If you love something set it free, if it doesn't come back to you hunt it down and set it on fire" -- George Carlin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20020418/630bbbab/attachment.pgp