Thank you for the research, unfortunatly you ignored my original note that only connections to port 80 are having problems. I can ping and traceroute every site just fine, even at the exact same instant that I'm trying to telnet to port 80. The ping/traceroute will complete, the telnet will timeout. sos at zjod.net (Steve Siegfried) writes: > Jon, > > After your last posting, I did a little extra homework on this. > > The sites you'd originally complained about as "coming and going" were: > http://slashdot.org > http://slashdot.com > http://www.air1.com > http://linuxgazette.com > http://www.csc.calpoly.edu > > Note that an nslookup on slashdot.org and slashdot.com map to the same ip > address. > > Note also that, as I gathered the data below, it's about 10:30pm CDT and > I'm on an AT&T Broadband cable modem in Mendota Heights. > > > Data: > > http://slashdot.{org,com} appear to have problems responding to traceroutes, > but only after leaving *.ip.att.net on routes owned by "exodus.net" (starting > at hop 14, see http://www.exodus.net for details). Presently slashdot.org is > NOT responding to pings and traceroutes never resolve, all due to a problem > somewhere within exodus.net. > > www.air1.com at 209.67.75.64 is 15 hops away, and is presently responding > to pings pretty consistently between 55 and 59ms with no dropped. packets. > Tracrouting this site hangs can sometime "hang" for a while (in real time) > somewhere in exodus.net (at or near the same router that's having trouble > finding slashdot.org). > > http://linuxgazette.com at 64.39.18.140 is 16 hops away, and is presently > responding to pings pretty consistently between 32 and 49ms with no dropped > packets. > > http://www.csc.calpoly.edu at 129.65.241.3 is 22 hops away and is presently > responding to pings pretty consistently between 110 and 130ms, also with no > dropped packets. > > Conclusion: > > AT&T (in the guise of *.mediaone.net and *.att.net) appear to have their > internal house pretty much in order, but rely on external connections to > non-AT&T networks that are less than fully stable. > > -S > > Jon Schewe wrote: > > > > sos at zjod.net (Steve Siegfried) writes: > > > > > Jon Schewe wrote: > > > > > > > > I've solved the nameserver issues by running my own nameserver. I've given up > > > > on theirs. > > > > > > > > > > And are you still unable to reach some sites, or did this cure the problem? > > > > > > Curious minds want to know'ildy, > > > > Didn't help. I've been running my own nameserver for the past 6 years, never > > used the one off any ISP, because they generally suck. Still can't get to the > > sites. As I noted earlier, it shouldn't be a DNS issue, unless the sites are > > doing reverse lookups because I can ping them and telnet to other ports > > successfully, but I can't telnet to port 80. > > > _______________________________________________ > tclug-list mailing list > tclug-list at mn-linux.org > https://mailman.mn-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list -- Jon Schewe | http://mtu.net/~jpschewe | jpschewe at mtu.net For I am convinced that neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons, neither the present nor the future, nor any powers, neither height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord. - Romans 8:38-39