On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 07:25:53AM -0600, Austad, Jay wrote: >Solaris runs well on Sun hardware, but not x86. Agreed. I picked up a copy while at ALS and it's awful. Since installing freebsd on my laptop, I never boot it into linux anymore. It's pretty fast and quite stable. Though the apm support is kinda bad, my kernel panics when my battery runs out. > >Jay > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Apu [mailto:isla0005 at tc.umn.edu] >> Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2000 4:48 AM >> To: tclug-list at lists.real-time.com >> Subject: [TCLUG] Solaris for Intel >> >> >> Solaris was available from Sun for intel machines couple >> months ago. Sun claims >> it's based on the same source code and very stable, also it's >> free for students >> and developers. I am wondering if any of you have used it or >> would it be wise >> to switch to solaris from my existing freeBSD 4.2 ? >> >> Apu >> >> _______________________________________________ >> tclug-list mailing list >> tclug-list at lists.real-time.com >> https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list >> >_______________________________________________ >tclug-list mailing list >tclug-list at lists.real-time.com >https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/tclug-list -- Ben Lutgens cell: 612.670.4789 http://www.sistina.com/ Sistina Software Inc. work: 612.379.3951 Code Monkey Support (A.K.A. System Administrator) Key fingerprint = A69A 118D 710B 8EB0 DC3B D912 2F19 311A 02DD 1908 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 230 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/tclug-list/attachments/20001202/5c2adba4/attachment.pgp