Re: [TCLUG:14922] linux 2.3.99pre1 --rocks! (mostly)

["Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net>]

Look at pre2 -- it is out.  It wouldn't compile using the configuration that
I wanted.  That has been the case for most of the 2.3 kernels.  Some, I was
able to fix the miskeys they left in.  Apparently, they do NO testing of the
2.3 kernels.  They may as well use a CVS repository.  It seems to me that is
a better solution.

Tom Veldhouse
veldy@veldy.net

----- Original Message -----
From: Ben Kochie <ben@nerp.net>
To: <tclug-list@mn-linux.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2000 10:47 AM
Subject: Re: [TCLUG:14922] linux 2.3.99pre1 --rocks! (mostly)


> I think you did not enable "experimental" listings.  there are WAY more
> cool things that are considered "experiemental"
>
> Thank You,
>         Ben Kochie (ben@nerp.net)
>
> *-----------------------*  [ - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - ]
> | Unix/Linux Consulting |  [ Haiku Error Message:          ]
> |  PC/Mac Repair        |  [  Chaos reigns within.         ]
> |   Networking          |  [  Reflect, repent, and reboot. ]
> | http://nerp.net       |  [  Order shall return.          ]
> *-----------------------*  [ - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - ]
>
>  "Unix is user friendly, Its just picky about its friends."
>
> On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote:
>
> > >Framebuffer support, and smbfs support are both in the
> > >2.2 kernel. ;)
> >         they are? I tried looking for framebuffer stuff in the 2.2.14
stock
> > kernel config, and didn't find it (at least not where it was in the
2.3.99
> > config).
> >         I know there was framebuffer support *available* for 2.2; but I
> > thought it must be a separate patch or something. (went looking for it
once
> > in the past, and didn't find it).
> >
> >         smbfs i'm probably wrong on, tho.
> >
> > also, forgot about the khttpd option now integrated into 2.3.99!
> > the question of course then is; how much web traffic do you actually
need;
> > before khttpd *really* becomes helpful? as I understand it; it's only
good
> > for helping static pages along... which are minimal load anyway. I
suppose
> > it leaves more headroom for scripts and stuff to run, tho.
> >         my web server at work here gets 2-3 hits a day, and serves
nothing
> > but static pages. so it's not like I have much of a clue about high-load
> > service. :)
> >
> > Carl Soderstrom
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tclug-list-unsubscribe@mn-linux.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: tclug-list-help@mn-linux.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tclug-list-unsubscribe@mn-linux.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tclug-list-help@mn-linux.org
>
>