Re: [TCLUG:14922] linux 2.3.99pre1 --rocks! (mostly)

[Ben Kochie <ben@nerp.net>]

I think you did not enable "experimental" listings.  there are WAY more
cool things that are considered "experiemental"

Thank You,
        Ben Kochie (ben@nerp.net)

*-----------------------*  [ - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - ]
| Unix/Linux Consulting |  [ Haiku Error Message:          ]
|  PC/Mac Repair        |  [  Chaos reigns within.         ]
|   Networking          |  [  Reflect, repent, and reboot. ]
| http://nerp.net       |  [  Order shall return.          ]
*-----------------------*  [ - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - ]

 "Unix is user friendly, Its just picky about its friends."

On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote:

> >Framebuffer support, and smbfs support are both in the
> >2.2 kernel. ;)
>         they are? I tried looking for framebuffer stuff in the 2.2.14 stock
> kernel config, and didn't find it (at least not where it was in the 2.3.99
> config). 
>         I know there was framebuffer support *available* for 2.2; but I
> thought it must be a separate patch or something. (went looking for it once
> in the past, and didn't find it).
> 
>         smbfs i'm probably wrong on, tho.
> 
> also, forgot about the khttpd option now integrated into 2.3.99! 
> the question of course then is; how much web traffic do you actually need;
> before khttpd *really* becomes helpful? as I understand it; it's only good
> for helping static pages along... which are minimal load anyway. I suppose
> it leaves more headroom for scripts and stuff to run, tho.
>         my web server at work here gets 2-3 hits a day, and serves nothing
> but static pages. so it's not like I have much of a clue about high-load
> service. :)
> 
> Carl Soderstrom
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tclug-list-unsubscribe@mn-linux.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tclug-list-help@mn-linux.org
>