Re: [TCLUG:14946] IMAP vs POP

To: tclug-list@mn-linux.org
Subject: Re: [TCLUG:14946] IMAP vs POP
From: Bob Tanner <tanner@real-time.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 21:59:20 -0600
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10003202157110.31104-100000@enchanter.real-time.com>; from natecars@real-time.com on Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 09:58:20PM -0600
Mail-Followup-To: tclug-list@mn-linux.org
References: <20000320214015.J25567@wizard.real-time.com> <Pine.LNX.4.10.10003202157110.31104-100000@enchanter.real-time.com>

Quoting Nate Carlson (natecars@real-time.com):
> Yup. Or, I believe you can disable the imap pop3 daemon and use qpopper..
> but I'm not sure what the advantages/disadvantages of that would be, and
> what kind of problems it could cause (anyone know how the imap daemon does
> mailbox locking vs. how qpopper does it?)

It's in the FAQ.

http://www.washington.edu/imap/

-- 
Bob Tanner <tanner@real-time.com>       | Phone : (612)943-8700
http://www.real-time.com                | Fax   : (612)943-8500
Key fingerprint =  6C E9 51 4F D5 3E 4C 66 62 A9 10 E5 35 85 39 D9

References:
- Re: [TCLUG:14946] IMAP vs POP
  - From: Bob Tanner <tanner@real-time.com>
- Re: [TCLUG:14946] IMAP vs POP
  - From: Nate Carlson <natecars@real-time.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [TCLUG:14946] IMAP vs POP
Next by Date: Re: [TCLUG:14946] IMAP vs POP
Prev by thread: Re: [TCLUG:14946] IMAP vs POP
Next by thread: Re: [TCLUG:14946] IMAP vs POP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread