Re: [TCLUG:19950] Debian glibc2.1

[Philip C Mendelsohn <mend0070@tc.umn.edu>]

On Mon, 31 Jul 2000, Andy Zbikowski wrote:

> glibc 2.1 has yet to make in into a stable debian distribution. Slink is
> glibc2.0. Potato (2.2) and Woody (2.3) are 2.1 based. Potato is frozen
> and in the third test cycle, woody is temper...I mean developmental
> (unstable).

So if that's what my problem turns out to be, upgrading the libs should
not be a big deal (relatively.)  Am I in error?

Cheers,
Phil

-- 
Lottery:    a tax on people who are bad at math