TCLUG Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [TCLUG:5285] NTS4 vs. Linux study from Mindcraft.
sheesh.. if i had 35-40k for a server.. i'd get a really decked out Sun
UE-450 or something, or even a pair of them. you can run lotus on a Sun
if i remember right.
Thank You,
Ben Kochie (ben@nerp.net)
*-----------------------* [ - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - ]
| Unix/Linux Consulting | [ Haiku Error Message: ]
| PC/Mac Repair | [ Chaos reigns within. ]
| Networking | [ Reflect, repent, and reboot. ]
| http://nerp.net | [ Order shall return. ]
*-----------------------* [ - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - ]
"Unix is user friendly, Its just picky about its friends."
On Thu, 15 Apr 1999, Christopher McKinley wrote:
> pani@frontiernet.net wrote:
> >
> > Maybe the benchmark would make more sense if it was run on
> > machines that an average user would buy for that kind of an
> > application. How many users really have these Xeon boxes being
> > used for web/file serving or planning to invest in one for the
> > same purpose anyway ?
> >
>
> Umm, my company has quite a few of these (2-4 Xeon) for Lotus Notes
> (blech!), and we are looking at getting a couple at 35-40K apiece
> (depends on disk space -- can you say 18GB UW-SCSI drives ... mmmm). We
> would not run NT on them, but IntraNetware (NetWare 4.x). I keep saying
> Linux, but noone takes me seriously.
>
> Anyway, what about the next TCLUG meeting? If we can get a high speed
> connection, we could do a pseudo-real-world study of local SMB, proxy,
> web, and email. I have DSL at home, and I would be willing to set
> something up here, or bring my box to the meeting.
>
> -Chris
>
> > If linux beats NT on cheaper hardware, which it most certainly
> > does, which more people can afford to buy then who cares that
> > NT runs faster if you add 4Gigs of RAM and 10 more processors ?
> >
> > Aah well, I am just pissed off that I do not have one of those
> > xeons, that is all *greeen*
> > --
> > sandipan
> >
> > Scott Dier wrote:
> > >
> > > Heh, what about us pre-college but-going-to-be-CS-majors-next-fall? :)
> > >
> > > Anyways, I have peeked through the smart reseller stuff. Pretty neato
> > > benchmarks, but nothing like the data from the mindcraft survey. Really,
> > > it would be cool to set it up, hammer some machines and have a managed
> > > port that we could hook MRTG to or something and make some graphs.
> > > Problem is, where do we get these sweet-ass boxes? :) I only know one
> > > person with a dual-celeron 504. And thats not even a xenon. Oh well.
> > > Even if we had a ppro system we could tell what it was like comparitevly.
> > > (linux vs nt vs netware etc.) I have access to NT Enterprise through a
> > > MSDN Universal subscription. (yay!) Too bad we couldn't convince my school
> > > district to let us conduct an experiment at school, Maple Grove Sr. High
> > > ;( (500+ pentium win95 boxen.) Anyways. That sparked more of a
> > > discussion than I expected. And it was on-topic. Sweet. :) (just
> > > digging the signal-to-noise ratio here.)
> > >
> > > Perhaps at the next meeting there should be a side-discussion
> > > (after-major-stuff, i guess i dont know the format of the meetings (yet))
> > > of interested parties to see if there is a real interest and avalibility
> > > of hardware to do this. Write it up as a report, and publish it to the
> > > world at large.
> > >
> > > I guess this also means that I am going to start going to tclug meetings.
> > > :)
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tclug-list-unsubscribe@listserv.real-time.com
> > For additional commands, e-mail: tclug-list-help@listserv.real-time.com
> > Try our website: http://tclug.real-time.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tclug-list-unsubscribe@listserv.real-time.com
> For additional commands, e-mail: tclug-list-help@listserv.real-time.com
> Try our website: http://tclug.real-time.com
>