Real Time Ascend Maling List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) IP-Pools on the Max-TNT
- To: ascend-users@bungi.com
- Subject: Re: (ASCEND) IP-Pools on the Max-TNT
- From: "Frank Heinzius" <frimp@mms.de>
- Date: Fri, 1 Oct 1999 15:22:15 +0200
- Comments: Sender has elected to use 8-bit data in this message. If problems arise, refer to postmaster at sender's site.
- In-reply-to: <4.2.0.58.19990930113009.00a4fbe0@mail.ipf.de>
- Organization: MMS Communication AG
- Priority: normal
- Reply-to: frimp@mms.de
- Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com
Hi,
On 30 Sep 99, at 11:38, Steve Meier wrote:
> pool-base-address = [ 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 194.29.40.1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
> 0.0.0 ...
Looks good.
> assign-count = [ 0 0 512 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
> 0 0 ...
>
Looks bad. After 511 assigned addresses in round-robin, youŽll have an
overflow after assigning 194.29.40.255 and 194.29.41.255
Instead, you should define two pools, starting at 1 and using 255
addresses instead of 256.
This should work.
A problem however may be the route-aggregate if you use OSPF (255 is
quite odd)...
Kind Regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen,
--
Frank M. Heinzius MMS Communication AG
mailto:frimp@mms.de Eiffestrasse 598
http://www.mms.de 20537 Hamburg, Germany
Phone: +49 40 211105-40 Fax: +49 40 210 32 210
-- spam forbidden -- -- PGP key available --
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>