Real Time Ascend Maling List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
(ASCEND) echo unsubscribe | mail ascend-users-digest-request@bungi.com
owner-ascend-users-digest@max.bungi.com wrote:
> ascend-users-digest Wednesday, 5 May 1999 Volume 96 : Number 1596
>
> In this issue:
>
> Re: (ASCEND) Question about Multi IP addr NAT
> Re: (ASCEND) Question about Multi IP addr NAT
> RE: (ASCEND) Question about Multi IP addr NAT
> (ASCEND) deleting inactive user
> RE: (ASCEND) Question about Multi IP addr NAT
> Re: [(ASCEND) deleting inactive user]
> Re: [(ASCEND) deleting inactive user]
> (ASCEND) ISDN bonding over multiple MAXes
> (ASCEND) test
> Re: [(ASCEND) deleting inactive user]
> Re: [(ASCEND) deleting inactive user]
> (ASCEND) redirect in Ascend.
> Re: (ASCEND) redirect in Ascend.
> Re: (ASCEND) redirect in Ascend.
> (ASCEND) test ID in Ascend..
> (ASCEND) addition of 10 lines to max
> (ASCEND) Radius and Max question
> Re: (ASCEND) P75 syslog questions
> Re: (ASCEND) deleting inactive user
> (ASCEND) ascend radius who supports it??
> (ASCEND) mail attachment problem
> (ASCEND) mail attachment problem
> Re: (ASCEND) Slower v.90 connections after line chg from DCS to PRI
> Re: (ASCEND) Big Files
> (ASCEND) Macintosh LC
> Re: [(ASCEND) power consumption?]
> (ASCEND) mail attatchment problem (more info)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> From: "Stanislav Galabov" <stanislav_galabov@smartcom.bg>
> Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 09:13:23 +0200
> Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Question about Multi IP addr NAT
>
> Hi,
>
> If you try to use a NAT LAN=Single IP Addr it might help, but this depends
> on your way of using NAT (or the way you want to use it).
> If the only thing you want to do is give access to users from the internal
> LAN to the Internet or to any other network, the Single IP would be great.
> There'll be no need of a DHCP server at the MAX end. You need only to assign
> a static/dynamic IP to the Pipeline itself when it dials into the MAX and
> that's all.
> But if you need the Internet to have access to some of the ports of some of
> your machines on the internal net (more than 10 ports), you need to set up a
> Multi IP addr. LAN for NAT.
> OK, I think that 10 ports/services are quite a few, but for a small/medium
> network they work fine. So if you want you can just make "static mappings"
> of the ports needed to be visible from the outside world and everything will
> be fine. No DHCP, no stuff like that.
> If that won't help (or you insist useing Multi IP LAN), check to see if the
> pool you're assigning the IP addresses from by DHCP has enough free (not yet
> leased) IPs.
>
> Wish you luck,
> Stanislav
>
> - -----Original Message-----
> From: Llabona, Nelson <nllabona@harris.com>
> To: ascend-users@max.bungi.com <ascend-users@max.bungi.com>
> Date: 05 νΑΚ 1999 Η. 02:53
> Subject: (ASCEND) Question about Multi IP addr NAT
>
> >Group,
> >
> >I have set up the MAX with a connection profile for a pipeline75.
> >It connects and can get everywhere, as can the first PC on the hub behind
> the
> >P75.
> >When the second PC on the hub powers up, it has no connectivity to the MAX
> and
> >beyond.
> >
> >First PC continues to work flawlessly while second PC cannot get past the
> P75.
> >Max is running 7.0.4 and P75 is running 6.0.6 load b2.p75.
> >
> >P75 is configured with NAT:
> > ->Routing =yes
> > ->Lan = Multi IP addr
> >
> >And MAX connection profile is set up DHCP Options :
> > ->Reply Enables = Yes
> > ->Pool Number = 0
> > ->Max Leases = 3
> >
> >Also what DHCP / NAT debug commands can I do on a P75 ???
> >
> >Sincerely,
> >Nelson Llabona
> >++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> >To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> >To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
> >
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: Mitchell Arnone <mitchell.arnone@occ.treas.gov>
> Date: Wed, 5 May 99 7:12:50 EDT
> Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Question about Multi IP addr NAT
>
> Nelson,
>
> I run about 24 P75s as remote LANs each with an average of 4-6 workstations
> connected to a minihub which is connected to the P75. I am using DHCP on
> the P75 and have configured a pool of IP addresses. This has always worked
> well for me and I highly recommend it.
>
> Your problem sounds like a TCP/IP addressing problem. Make sure the
> network mask assigned to the Pipe75 properly reflects the subnet
> configuration and make sure that the IP address pool reflects addresses
> associated with the subnet being used.
>
> For example, if you are using a 28bit subnet, you will have a maximum of 14
> usable IP addresses. Assume you are using the network 192.168.44.x, assign
> the first usable IP address(192.168.44.1) to the Pipeline then assign the
> next 10 address to the DHCP modem pool on the Pipe75 as follows:
>
> (ethernet>modconfig>dhcpspoofing)
> DHCP spoofing=yes
> Renewal time=600
> become default router=yes
> always spoof=yes
> validate IP = yes
> maximum no reply wait=15
> IP Group 1=192.168.44.2
> Group 1 count = 10
>
> With this configuration, up to ten workstations can be assigned an IP
> address dynamically. There are three remaining addresses in this network
> and I reserve them for static assignement to printers.
>
> I also support home offices that have only a single workstation connected
> to a Pipe75. Since these staff also travel to other locations, I want them
> to use DHCP everywhere they go. On the Pipe75 in their home I use the same
> configuration as above except I use a 30bit subnet mask and assign the
> first of the two available addresses to the Pipe75 then assign the second
> address to the pool as shown above except that I assign a group count of 1
> and set "validate IP" to no (this is important because the Pipe will not
> assign the IP address properly if there is only one address in the pool and
> validate IP is set to yes).
>
> Again, I have been using this configuration successfully for more than 18
> months.
>
> If you would like to talk more offline, email me directly at
> "mitchell.arnone@occ.treas.gov"
>
> Mitch
> - -------------
> Original Text
> From: "Melissa Meister" <super_mel@mindspring.com>, on 5/4/99 8:01 PM:
> To: SMTP@DC2@OCC["Llabona, Nelson" <nllabona@harris.com>]
> Cc: SMTP@DC2@OCC[<ascend-users@max.bungi.com>]
>
> nelson,
>
> first, the P75 should be configured for "single IP addr" rather than
> multi - that might fix your problem
>
> also, are all the computers on the same subnet? that might cause a
> problem as well.
>
> the P75 can act as a DHCP server - but I wouldn't recommend it.
>
> hope that helps!
>
> Melissa Meister
>
> "Llabona, Nelson" wrote:
> >
> > Group,
> >
> > I have set up the MAX with a connection profile for a pipeline75.
> > It connects and can get everywhere, as can the first PC on the hub behind
> the
> > P75.
> > When the second PC on the hub powers up, it has no connectivity to the
> MAX and
> > beyond.
> >
> > First PC continues to work flawlessly while second PC cannot get past the
> P75.
> > Max is running 7.0.4 and P75 is running 6.0.6 load b2.p75.
> >
> > P75 is configured with NAT:
> > ->Routing =yes
> > ->Lan = Multi IP addr
> >
> > And MAX connection profile is set up DHCP Options :
> > ->Reply Enables = Yes
> > ->Pool Number = 0
> > ->Max Leases = 3
> >
> > Also what DHCP / NAT debug commands can I do on a P75 ???
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Nelson Llabona
> > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> > To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> - --
> Melissa
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: "Llabona, Nelson" <nllabona@harris.com>
> Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 09:27:50 -0400
> Subject: RE: (ASCEND) Question about Multi IP addr NAT
>
> Thanks for all the suggestions and feedback.
>
> I need Multi IP addr because I want the IP address of EACH PC to be NATed
> to another IP address. (I have used Single IP before, but it doesn't meet my
> current requirements). I do not want to translate ports, I want to translate IP
> addresses,
> because both PCs need to be accessible from the internet AND both run the
> required application on the same TCP port (BTW we cannot change what port the
> application runs on).
>
> For those of you wondering what I am doing, this is the idea.
> 1. P75 dials into local ISP.
> 2. Each PC behind the P75 has access to the internet.
> 3. Each PC behind the P75 uses an IPSEC client software to connect to
> headquaters.
> 4. Each PC behind the P75 has a secure, encrypted, IPSEC tunnel to
> headquaters.
>
> Both PCs behind the pipeline need to be NATed to different IPs.
>
> For example :
>
> LAN addresses NATed addresses
>
> PC1 10.10.10.2 --- ---> 192.216.191.57
> P75 10.10.10.1
> PC2 10.10.10.3 --- ---> 192.216.191.58
>
> Thanks.
>
> Sincerely,
> Nelson Llabona
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: Jane Hsiung Wojcik <jwojcik@media.mit.edu>
> Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 11:16:13 -0400
> Subject: (ASCEND) deleting inactive user
>
> One of our user is complaining about not being able to log on because
> max tells him he is already logged in.
>
> He doesn't show up in the active sessions window. A 'show users'
> indicates that he has an entry with a 0 session id, and N/A in most
> other fields. Is this causing the max to think he is already logged in?
> How does one delete this entry?
>
> We have a Max4000 running 6.1.7.
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: Eric Reeves <tilex@alluvium.com>
> Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 11:44:27 -0500 (CDT)
> Subject: RE: (ASCEND) Question about Multi IP addr NAT
>
> On Wed, 5 May 1999, Llabona, Nelson wrote:
>
> > I need Multi IP addr because I want the IP address of EACH PC to be NATed
> > to another IP address. (I have used Single IP before, but it doesn't meet my
> > current requirements). I do not want to translate ports, I want to translate IP
> > addresses,
> > because both PCs need to be accessible from the internet AND both run the
> > required application on the same TCP port (BTW we cannot change what port the
> > application runs on).
> >
>
> Pardon my ignorance, but why would you run Multi-IP NAT? Why not just use
> the "legitimate" IP's on the internal workstations? I'm curious about
> your scenario, if you wouldn't mind a quick and dirty explanation.
>
> Thanks.
>
> +------------------------------------------+
> | Eric Reeves ereeves@ghg.net |
> | GHG Corporation tilex@alluvium.com |
> +------------------------------------------+
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: Maverick <maverickthegreat@netscape.net>
> Date: 5 May 99 10:53:51 PDT
> Subject: Re: [(ASCEND) deleting inactive user]
>
> Jane,
>
> The only way to get rid of those ghost sessions is to
> reboot the MAX. You should also try upgrading the MAX to
> software 6.1.24 to remedy the ghost session problem.
>
> 6.1.24 does have some fixes for the ghost sessions
> that stay on the MAX even though the user has
> obviously disconnected.
>
> Jane Hsiung Wojcik <jwojcik@media.mit.edu> wrote:
> One of our user is complaining about not being able to log on because
> max tells him he is already logged in.
>
> He doesn't show up in the active sessions window. A 'show users'
> indicates that he has an entry with a 0 session id, and N/A in most
> other fields. Is this causing the max to think he is already logged in?
> How does one delete this entry?
>
> We have a Max4000 running 6.1.7.
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________
> Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com.
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: Joel R Nola II <jnola@flash.net>
> Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 13:37:47 -0500
> Subject: Re: [(ASCEND) deleting inactive user]
>
> At 10:53 AM 5/5/99 -0700, Maverick wrote:
> >>Jane Hsiung Wojcik <jwojcik@media.mit.edu> wrote:
> >>One of our user is complaining about not being able to log on because
> >>max tells him he is already logged in.
> >>
> >>He doesn't show up in the active sessions window. A 'show users'
> >>indicates that he has an entry with a 0 session id, and N/A in most
> >>other fields. Is this causing the max to think he is already logged in?
> >>How does one delete this entry?
> >>
> >>We have a Max4000 running 6.1.7.
> >The only way to get rid of those ghost sessions is to
> >reboot the MAX. You should also try upgrading the MAX to
> >software 6.1.24 to remedy the ghost session problem.
> >
> >6.1.24 does have some fixes for the ghost sessions
> >that stay on the MAX even though the user has
> >obviously disconnected.
>
> Actually, we never experienced this kind of problem until we INSTALLED
> 6.1.24 on our network. Ever since the v.90 standard came out in the Ascend
> revs, we've had nothing but trouble finding a stable code to offer to our
> users. We were previously using 5.0Ap42, which was rock-solid for us, but
> no v.90. We've tried 6.1.7 (memory problem with un-allocating assigned
> IPs), 7.0 (a tragedy), 7.0.4 (constant reboots), and are now currently
> running 6.1.24. This is when we've started seeing the problems described
> above. 6.1.7 has been the most stable for us in the environment where all
> users have dynamic IPs assigned to them, but the memory issues erupted in
> the cases of static IP users.
> What kind of connectivity are you providing for your user? Is it ISDN or
> a modem? Does he have a static IP, or dynamically assigned out of an IP
> pool? Are you using RADIUS, or connection profiles?
> Regardless, Maverick's right. The only way to get rid of that entry is to
> reboot the box. There are some instances where you can delete the IP
> route, which I've found sometimes clears out the session so he can log in
> again, but it isn't 100% effective. If v.90 isn't an issue, or if your
> user is trying to connect via ISDN, I recommend going to an earlier code rev.
>
> HTH
>
> Joel
>
> Joel R Nola II
> Senior Network Administration
> Flashnet Communications
>
> http://www.flash.net
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: Ted Olson <tolson@ocsnet.net>
> Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 12:30:08 -0700
> Subject: (ASCEND) ISDN bonding over multiple MAXes
>
> We've discovered that when the primary MAX dialed by an ISDN account is
> busy, it is possible that when the same account requests a second channel
> that port could be opened on a different MAX further down the line in our
> hunt group.
>
> This confuses DNS, especially if the first channel drops off leaving only
> the second open - users then have a connection but can't see the Net since
> their router (a P130) is pointed only to the IP addr of the first MAX while
> their connection is now trying to route to a different box. The channels
> seem to bond OK and the Pipeline indicates 128K with 2-channels up even
> when each is on a different box - DNS is the only issue.
>
> Is this kind of arrangement not recommended? What are the best solutions?
> We've experimented with adding a route on the downstream MAXes to point
> back to the primary, with no success. Should multi-channel accounts be
> physically confined to the same box? Or should they be nailed (I could use
> any how-to pointers if so).
>
> Thanks,
> - -Ted
> OCS Software
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: Melissa Meister <theorist@mindspring.com>
> Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 13:14:46 -0700
> Subject: (ASCEND) test
>
> - --
> Melissa
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: Jane Hsiung Wojcik <jwojcik@media.mit.edu>
> Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 16:17:30 -0400
> Subject: Re: [(ASCEND) deleting inactive user]
>
> Joel R Nola II wrote:
> > What kind of connectivity are you providing for your user? Is it ISDN or
> > a modem? Does he have a static IP, or dynamically assigned out of an IP
> > pool? Are you using RADIUS, or connection profiles?
>
> It is an isdn user with a static ip address from a radius profile.
> Actually we have been running 6.1.7 for a while and it's been stable. I
> am afraid going back to earlier versions is not an option as we need
> v.90 support.
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: Joel R Nola II <jnola@flash.net>
> Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 15:34:08 -0500
> Subject: Re: [(ASCEND) deleting inactive user]
>
> At 04:17 PM 5/5/99 -0400, Jane Hsiung Wojcik wrote:
> >
> >
> >Joel R Nola II wrote:
> >> What kind of connectivity are you providing for your user? Is
> it ISDN or
> >> a modem? Does he have a static IP, or dynamically assigned out of an IP
> >> pool? Are you using RADIUS, or connection profiles?
> >
> >It is an isdn user with a static ip address from a radius profile.
> >Actually we have been running 6.1.7 for a while and it's been stable. I
> >am afraid going back to earlier versions is not an option as we need
> >v.90 support.
> >
>
> Well... You could try 6.1.3. We heard that there were problems with
> reboots, but we haven't tested it out completely. 6.1.7 was a real problem
> for us in the setup that you're describing to me. Rather than trying an
> older code, we tried to go to 6.1.24, which was disaterous. I'm curious,
> what kind of load are you putting on this box? 6.1.7 worked very well for
> us in a lab environment, but that was under a minimal caller load. And...
> what is the uptime of the box? When I first "earned my wings" in this
> department, we regularly rebooted the ISDN access equipment to keep memory
> issues at a minimum. That might be something you would want to look into,
> I don't know.
> 6.1.7 has worked very well for us in all other utilizations (analog, ISDN
> w/o static IPs) using RADIUS for authentication. It just didn't work with
> ISDN and static IPs. If I could, I would continue to use that rev. of code...
>
> Joel
>
> Joel R Nola II
> Senior Network Administration
> Flashnet Communications
>
> http://www.flash.net
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: "Code Chang" <codec@gcn.net.tw>
> Date: Thu, 6 May 1999 09:02:13 +0800
> Subject: (ASCEND) redirect in Ascend.
>
> hi, All
>
> I tried to find how to redirect all of traffic from dial-in user to a single web site ?
> Then we can create a guest account for testing user.
>
> Yesterday, I searched the mail list, I found the *redirect* keyword.
> But no examples ! :( Any clues ?
>
> Thanks !
>
> rgds,
> - ----
> Code Chang // Chang Hsiao-Chuan
> Reach and Range Inc. Http://www.gcn.net.tw/
> Mailto: codec@gcn.net.tw ICQ:8013223
> Office: +886-2-2549-6877#228 Fax: +886-2-2549-6999
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: "Sam Hayes Merritt, III" <harter@feeding.frenzy.com>
> Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 21:23:59 -0500 (CDT)
> Subject: Re: (ASCEND) redirect in Ascend.
>
> On Thu, 6 May 1999, Code Chang wrote:
>
> > I tried to find how to redirect all of traffic from dial-in
> > user to a single web site ? Then we can create a guest account
> > for testing user.
> >
> > Yesterday, I searched the mail list, I found the *redirect*
> > keyword. But no examples ! :( Any clues ?
>
> Use Ascend-Data-Filter's in the radius attributes for the guest
> user.
>
> - --
> Sam Hayes Merritt, III
> http://www.frenzy.com/~harter/
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: "Code Chang" <codec@gcn.net.tw>
> Date: Thu, 6 May 1999 10:27:24 +0800
> Subject: Re: (ASCEND) redirect in Ascend.
>
> hi, All
>
> Could you please give me a example ?
> If the default web site is 10.0.0.1 !
>
> Thanks !
>
> rgds,
> - ----
> Code Chang // Chang Hsiao-Chuan
> Reach and Range Inc. Http://www.gcn.net.tw/
> Mailto: codec@gcn.net.tw ICQ:8013223
> Office: +886-2-2549-6877#228 Fax: +886-2-2549-6999
>
> >
> > > I tried to find how to redirect all of traffic from dial-in
> > > user to a single web site ? Then we can create a guest account
> > > for testing user.
> > >
> > > Yesterday, I searched the mail list, I found the *redirect*
> > > keyword. But no examples ! :( Any clues ?
> >
> > Use Ascend-Data-Filter's in the radius attributes for the guest
> > user.
> >
> > --
> > Sam Hayes Merritt, III
> > http://www.frenzy.com/~harter/
> >
> >
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: "Code Chang" <codec@gcn.net.tw>
> Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 20:34:51 +0800
> Subject: (ASCEND) test ID in Ascend..
>
> hi, All.
>
> Can I create a user ID in ascend for testing.
> And forward any domain and IP to a default web site ?
>
> Thanks !
>
> rgds,
> - ----
> Code Chang // Chang Hsiao-Chuan
> Reach and Range Inc. Http://www.gcn.net.tw/
> Mailto: codec@gcn.net.tw ICQ:8013223
> Office: +886-2-2549-6877#228 Fax: +886-2-2549-6999
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: Roddy Strachan <roddy@satlink.com.au>
> Date: Thu, 6 May 1999 00:47:06 +0000 ( )
> Subject: (ASCEND) addition of 10 lines to max
>
> Hi,
> We just had another 10 lines added to our Max 6000. Is there
> anyway to find out whether this has been done or not, with tests in the
> max?? Or does it just automatically find it?
>
> - ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Roddy Strachan Email - roddy@satlink.com.au
> Systems Administrator ICQ - 1987890
> Satlink Internet Services Ph. - +61-3-9775-2600
> www.satlink.com.au Fax. - +61-3-9775-2456
> - ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: Gavin Cameron <gavin@itworks.com.au>
> Date: Thu, 6 May 1999 14:15:28 +1000 (EST)
> Subject: (ASCEND) Radius and Max question
>
> Hi,
>
> My clients have a radius server and a Max 4060. On this Max they require
> users to dial in from a certain phone number and they use the
> Calling-Station-Id=xxx to enforce this.
>
> Now they want to onstall a second Max that the same set of users can call
> from any number.
>
> How can I go about telling this second Max to ignore the
> Calling-Station-Id setting?
>
> Ta,
> Gavin
>
> []-----------------------------------+------------------------------------[]
> | Gavin Cameron | ITworks Consulting |
> | Ph : +61 3 9667 0297 | Suite 100, 85 Grattan Street |
> | Fax : +61 3 9347 6544 | Carlton, Victoria |
> | Email : gavin@itworks.com.au | Australia, 3053 |
> []-----------------------------------+------------------------------------[]
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: Phillip Vandry <vandry@Mlink.NET>
> Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 10:04:42 -0400 (EDT)
> Subject: Re: (ASCEND) P75 syslog questions
>
> > I've been attempting to do the same using the Syslog feature, and I
> > trying to include on-line time accounting (for those of us who don't have
> > unlimited access.) Getting simple callerID info is easy, but because of how
> > Ascend doesn't track calls by a unique ID during a call is making accounting
> > difficult. Sometimes, they show a MBID for the call, and sometimes it's a
> > call id, and sometimes there is nothing to help track the call.
> >
> > Anyone have ideas?
>
> You should definately use RADIUS accounting information. Look at the detail
> files, they have a Session-ID, they have Caller-ID, and tons of other
> information. Plus the delivery of RADIUS accounting packets is more reliable
> than syslog (despite the fact that they're both UDP).
>
> - -Phil
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: Phillip Vandry <vandry@Mlink.NET>
> Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 12:16:16 -0400 (EDT)
> Subject: Re: (ASCEND) deleting inactive user
>
> > One of our user is complaining about not being able to log on because
> > max tells him he is already logged in.
> >
> > He doesn't show up in the active sessions window. A 'show users'
> > indicates that he has an entry with a 0 session id, and N/A in most
> > other fields. Is this causing the max to think he is already logged in?
> > How does one delete this entry?
>
> No. Sessions like you describe, that look like this:
>
> O 0 N/A 0:0 N/A N/A PPP 209.104.88.114 Pmarathon
>
> can be ignored.
>
> Unfortunately the Max will sometimes think a user is logged in when they
> aren't. For MPP sessions, this can force the max to treat a new call as
> a second call on an existing session (and this fail). It can also cause
> what you are seeing, I guess.
>
> I'm not aware of any solution except to reboot.
>
> There is a possible workaround, but I'm not sure if it works: in RADIUS,
> add a User-Name = "xxx" parameter where "xxx" is something other than the
> user's real username. This might make the Max use "xxx" as the username
> instead of the real username and allow the new session.
>
> - -Phil
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: chris smith <chrissmith@skywizard.com>
> Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 11:11:21 -0400
> Subject: (ASCEND) ascend radius who supports it??
>
> can anyone tell me wheere to get in touch with the maker of the ascend
> radius program, I am in need of some updates.
>
> thanks
> chrissmith@skywizard.com
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: "Jerry O'Brien" <jobrien@cuttingedge.net>
> Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 23:23:47 -0500
> Subject: (ASCEND) mail attachment problem
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm out of ideas here...
>
> I have a group of users who can't send email attachments through one of my
> Max 4048s. Another identical box at a different site works fine, so I'm
> ruling out customer equipment and DNS. Anyone know of anything in the 4K
> configuration that could cause this? It happens to files as small as 40K, so
> I don't think it's a size problem. My mail log (Linux, sendmail 8.?) says
> the server is waiting to receive mail data, but then times out after two
> hours. I think the clients are giving up and closing sooner, but the mail
> server always waits for the timeout.
>
> TIA
>
> Jerry O'Brien
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: "Jerry O'Brien" <jobrien@cuttingedge.net>
> Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 23:23:47 -0500
> Subject: (ASCEND) mail attachment problem
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm out of ideas here...
>
> I have a group of users who can't send email attachments through one of my
> Max 4048s. Another identical box at a different site works fine, so I'm
> ruling out customer equipment and DNS. Anyone know of anything in the 4K
> configuration that could cause this? It happens to files as small as 40K, so
> I don't think it's a size problem. My mail log (Linux, sendmail 8.?) says
> the server is waiting to receive mail data, but then times out after two
> hours. I think the clients are giving up and closing sooner, but the mail
> server always waits for the timeout.
>
> TIA
>
> Jerry O'Brien
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: Jim Howard <jhoward@lyceum.com>
> Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 09:44:11 -0400
> Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Slower v.90 connections after line chg from DCS to PRI
>
> At 10:58 1999/05/04 -0500, david wrote:
> >the ISDN worked fine but the 56K users which had been connecting at 42k to
> >52K dropped to 28 to 36k. A marked decrease in speed. We have contacted the
> >teleco (GTE) which as usual says it is not at their end. We have also
>
> If the telco expects voice calls over the voice bearer channels,
> they may have some digital "padding" to shape the sound
> and soften spikes or noise. Try asking their switch techs
> about padding and see where that leads...
>
> - -Jim H
> - ----
> Jim Howard Sr Network Engineer Lyceum Internet
> jhoward@lyceum.com http://www.lyceum.com/ 404.248.1733
>
> My PGP Public Key: http://www.lyceum.com/~jhoward/pgp-key.txt
> Fingerprint: 7E8B E2BA 1314 2535 CB08 CFF9 119B 7CD3 2488 954D
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: Melissa Meister <theorist@mindspring.com>
> Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 09:34:32 -0700
> Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Big Files
>
> > The serial number are 6300xxx in other words, old models and I believe 6.0.9
> > is the hihest that I can go.
>
> yes, you are correct, that's the highest you can go.
>
> > Is there any way to clean the NAT tables?
>
> only by resetting the box - that may not be your problem...6.0.9 is not
> supposed to have problems with NAT tables.
>
> what cause codes do you get for disconnecting? (term serv mode, command
> is "show isdn")
>
> also, another option, you could take a trace of your session if you have
> a packet sniffer or if you can read hex (debug mode, command "wandis
> 64"). this will be a HUGE trace, so you might want to take a log of the
> session, then dial in and download a huge file, and then copy the
> session and decode it...might show you why it's disconnecting...
>
> just some thoughts,
> Melissa
>
> >
> > Claudio Stifel
> > Intercity
> > ------
> > hmm...what's the serial number? is 6.0.9 the highest you can go, if you
> > have a rev 2 box, might want to consider going to 6.1.19. the NAT
> > tables might be filling up.
> >
> > Melissa Meister
> >
> > claudio@tasco.cl wrote:
> > >
> > > Does anybody knows about this?
> > >
> > > Some of my customers with P50 tell me that when they download big files
> > > from sites in the Internet, let's say an 8MB file, after downloading 1MB or
> > > 2 the connection stops.
> > > I do not have any filer.
> > > The P50 are doing NAT nicely (6.09)
> > >
> > > Any idea?
> > >
> > > Claus
> > >
> > > ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> > > To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> > > To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
> >
> > --
> > Melissa
>
> - --
> Melissa
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: Jill Bell <j.m.bell@bradford.ac.uk>
> Date: Wed, 05 May 1999 10:56:12 +0100
> Subject: (ASCEND) Macintosh LC
>
> Since we moved to 6.1.24 and 7.0.4 we have had problems connecting old
> Macs. (I know they are VERY old but we still have a couple of users with
> them. They are rumming MacTCP 1.1 (or higher) and System 7.
>
> Any ideas? Should I try Open Transport, or is there a paramater tweak I
> can do?
>
> Thanks
> Jill Bell
> Bradford University
> West Yorkshire
> UK
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: Cyril Jaouich <twiggy@twiggy.spider.org>
> Date: Thu, 6 May 1999 16:58:49 -0400 (EDT)
> Subject: Re: [(ASCEND) power consumption?]
>
> On Fri, 23 Apr 1999, Phillip Vandry wrote:
>
> > > Input power : MAX 6000 80W (nominal) - 200W (maximum)
> > > MAX 4000 80W (nominal) - 120W (maximum)
> >
> > The original poster's figures sound high, but this sounds low. I assume
> > this is with no modems?
>
> The way we did it, is 200VA per 4048 with modems and 250VA for
> 4004 with modems. We used a ratio of 1 VA = .9 Watt, and we always left
> about 100VA for safety. So on a 1kVA UPS, you fit 4 4048 and 1
> etherswitch.
>
> Later
>
> Cyril Jaouich [CJ837]
> - ---------------------
> AT&T Canada Internetworking specialist
> - --------------------------------------
> Only 5744 hours before Y2K, will you be compliant?
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> From: "Jerry O'Brien" <jobrien@cuttingedge.net>
> Date: Thu, 6 May 1999 00:00:45 -0500
> Subject: (ASCEND) mail attatchment problem (more info)
>
> Here's a little more information from the dial-up PCs SMTP log:
>
> It looks like the PC just fails to send, but why on only one NAS and not the
> other??
>
> Jerry O'Brien
>
> SMTP: 23:37:55 [rx] 220 TAIPAN.cuttingedge.net ESMTP Sendmail 8.8.5/8.8.5;
> Wed, 5 May 1999 23:38:15 -0700
> SMTP: 23:37:55 [tx] HELO bear
> SMTP: 23:37:56 [rx] 250 TAIPAN.cuttingedge.net Hello ppp80.cuttingedge.net
> [xxx.xx.x.80], pleased to meet you
> SMTP: 23:37:56 [tx] MAIL FROM: <jobrien@cuttingedge.net>
> SMTP: 23:37:56 [rx] 250 <jobrien@cuttingedge.net>... Sender ok
> SMTP: 23:37:56 [tx] RCPT TO: <janet@cuttingedge.net>
> SMTP: 23:37:56 [rx] 250 <janet@cuttingedge.net>... Recipient ok
> SMTP: 23:37:56 [tx] DATA
> SMTP: 23:37:56 [rx] 354 Enter mail, end with "." on a line by itself
>
> (during this time I switched my dial-up connection to another Max 4048)
>
> SMTP: 23:42:11 [rx] 220 TAIPAN.cuttingedge.net ESMTP Sendmail 8.8.5/8.8.5;
> Wed, 5 May 1999 23:42:31 -0700
> SMTP: 23:42:11 [tx] HELO bear
> SMTP: 23:42:12 [rx] 250 TAIPAN.cuttingedge.net Hello ppp158.cuttingedge.net
> [xxx.xx.x.158], pleased to meet you
> SMTP: 23:42:12 [tx] MAIL FROM: <jobrien@cuttingedge.net>
> SMTP: 23:42:12 [rx] 250 <jobrien@cuttingedge.net>... Sender ok
> SMTP: 23:42:12 [tx] RCPT TO: <janet@cuttingedge.net>
> SMTP: 23:42:12 [rx] 250 <janet@cuttingedge.net>... Recipient ok
> SMTP: 23:42:12 [tx] DATA
> SMTP: 23:42:12 [rx] 354 Enter mail, end with "." on a line by itself
> SMTP: 23:44:13 [tx]
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of ascend-users-digest V96 #1596
> ************************************
>
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List Digest++
> To unsubscribe:
> "echo unsubscribe | mail ascend-users-digest-request@bungi.com"
> To get FAQ'd: <http://www.shore.net/~dreaming/ascend-faq>
> or <ftp://ftp.shore.net/members/dreaming/ascend-faq.txt>
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>