Re: (ASCEND) SUCCESS!! (TNT ip-pools)

[Jason Nealis <nealis@babylon.erols.com>]

Nope, I think the behavior of the TNT is to exhaust one pool then
move on to the other. 

Why do you want to assign from both pools from the start?

Jason Nealis
Director Internet Operations / Network Access
Erols Internet (An RCN Company)


On Wed, 6 Jan 1999, William R. Charnock wrote:

> Thanks for all the help:
> 
> admin> ip-pools
> 
> Pool#                Base         Count      InUse
>    1             209.197.193.1     254        252
>    2             209.197.199.1     254          2
> 
>  Number of remaining allocated addresses:    0
> 
> Looks like it is working now...
> 
> I have another question, is there a way to make the TNT cycle through both
> pools in a round-robin format?
> 
> --
> William Charnock
> CTO, FastLane Internet Services
> (817)-429-5263
> netadmin@fastlane.net
> 
> ++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
> To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
> To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
> 

++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>