Ascend Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (ASCEND) NAT: Yadda yadda yadda
At 02:40 AM 1/23/98 -0800, Devin Ganger wrote:
>On Fri, 23 Jan 1998, William T Wilson wrote:
>
>> Ascend probably never expected anyone to use NAT over a T1 link, most
>> people that pay for a T1 can get their ISP to assign them whatever they
>> ask. NAT was probably expected only over ISDN. And I wouldn't expect
>> 50-75 hosts on an ISDN link either. :) (Although as I said, I'm going to
>> put about 30 on one :) )
>
>Just a side note not related to NAT:
As you point out, the major difference being that they are NOT using NAT...
>I've successfully run a 30+-host subnet (for a website design company,
>no less!) off of an ISDN line and a P50, without terribly bogging down
>the link. The biggest drain of bandwidth was all of the Word documents
>our clients kept sending us as attachments in email -- usually addressed
>to 4-6 recipients at our company.
>
>Last I knew, they were well over 50 hosts and still using the same ISDN
>line without too many complaints...
>
>--
>Devin L. Ganger <devin@premier1.net>
>Chief Systems Administrator
>Premier1 Internet Services
>
>++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
>To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
>To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
>
Kevin
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe: send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd: <http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>
References: