Re: (ASCEND) Ascend OSPF?

To: Martin Hannigan <hannigan@xcom.net>
Subject: Re: (ASCEND) Ascend OSPF?
From: Matt Holdrege <matt@ascend.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 1998 23:38:03 -0800
Cc: ascend-users@bungi.com
In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.19980114184025.02ed7fc4@mailhost>
Sender: owner-ascend-users@max.bungi.com

At 06:40 PM 1/14/98 -0500, Martin Hannigan wrote:
>
>I've been hearing from multiple sources that Ascend OSPF
>is not stable.
>
>Can anyone give some detail?

As you may know, OSPF performance and reliability depends heavily on
design. This is true no matter what router product you use. With the Ascend
Max, which is more of a NAS than it is a "backbone" router, the design is
critical. 

Some designs work very well. We have many OSPF customers who run without
any problems. We have others with different designs that do have problems.
It's best to check with your local Ascend SE if you can.

Matt Holdrege		http://www.ascend.com	matt@ascend.com
++ Ascend Users Mailing List ++
To unsubscribe:	send unsubscribe to ascend-users-request@bungi.com
To get FAQ'd:	<http://www.nealis.net/ascend/faq>

References:

(ASCEND) Ascend OSPF?

From: Martin Hannigan <hannigan@xcom.net>

Prev by Date: Re: (ASCEND) MAX 4048 + 5.0Ap38 oddity
Next by Date: Re: (ASCEND) Log In for Beta releases etc.
Prev by thread: (ASCEND) Ascend OSPF?
Next by thread: Re: (ASCEND) Ascend OSPF?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread